PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $173 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $333 MSRP).
✅Delivers 105.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $333 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-9700.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 8,540).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-9700

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($333 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Core i7-9700

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $173 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $333 MSRP).
✅Delivers 105.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $333 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-9700.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 8,540).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($333 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700 better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Core i7-9700 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 15.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 4.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 1.4% higher PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 15.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700 is the better fit. You are getting 4.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-9700 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i7-9700 is 108.1% more expensive on MSRP at $333 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 15.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 105.3% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 39.7 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i5-10400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Core i7-9700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-9700
1080p
low	192 FPS	197 FPS
medium	152 FPS	171 FPS
high	123 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	169 FPS
medium	119 FPS	142 FPS
high	97 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	88 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	87 FPS
medium	70 FPS	78 FPS
high	55 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	48 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-9700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-9700
1080p
low	326 FPS	330 FPS
medium	318 FPS	303 FPS
high	290 FPS	279 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	248 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	314 FPS
medium	292 FPS	275 FPS
high	267 FPS	255 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	223 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	241 FPS
medium	258 FPS	215 FPS
high	235 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	178 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-9700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-9700
1080p
low	326 FPS	330 FPS
medium	326 FPS	330 FPS
high	326 FPS	330 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	330 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	330 FPS
medium	326 FPS	330 FPS
high	326 FPS	330 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	330 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	330 FPS
medium	326 FPS	330 FPS
high	289 FPS	330 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	307 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-9700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-9700
1080p
low	326 FPS	330 FPS
medium	326 FPS	330 FPS
high	326 FPS	330 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	330 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	330 FPS
medium	326 FPS	330 FPS
high	326 FPS	330 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	330 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	330 FPS
medium	326 FPS	330 FPS
high	326 FPS	330 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	330 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i7-9700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i7-9700

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i7-9700

The Core i7-9700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,206 points. Launch price was $323.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-9700 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.7 GHz on the Core i7-9700 — a 8.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-9700 uses Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i7-9700's 13,206 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i7-9700. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 8,540 (4.2% advantage for the Core i7-9700). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,570, a 7.7% lead for the Core i7-9700 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 7,202 (21.9% advantage for the Core i7-9700). Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-9700
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 8+33%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.7 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
PassMark	13,029	13,206+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	8,540+4%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	1,570+8%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	7,202+25%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-9700 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and LGA1151 (Core i7-9700).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-9700
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-9700 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i7-9700
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Core i7-9700 debuted at $333. On MSRP ($160 vs $333), the Core i5-10400F is $173 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 39.7 pts/$ for the Core i7-9700 — making the Core i5-10400F the 69% better value option.