
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Core i7-9850H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-9850H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Core i7-9850H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9850H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9850H
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 630, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,000 vs 5,783).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Core i7-9850H
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-9850H.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 630, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Core i7-9850H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9850H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,000 vs 5,783).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Core i7-9850H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-9850H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-9850H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 272 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 269 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 272 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 199 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-9850H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 272 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 239 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-9850H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i7-9850H

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i7-9850H
Core i7-9850H
The Core i7-9850H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,862 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-10400F and Core i7-9850H share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i7-9850H — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-9850H (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-9850H uses Coffee Lake-HR (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i7-9850H's 10,862 — a 18.1% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,250, a 15.1% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 5,000 (14.5% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-9850H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.6 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+12% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Coffee Lake-HR (2019) |
| PassMark | 13,029+20% | 10,862 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454+16% | 1,250 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783+16% | 5,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-9850H uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and HM370,CM246 (Core i7-9850H).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-9850H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-9850H includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core i7-9850H targets High Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-9850H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | High Performance Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












