
Core i5-10400F

Core i7-9850HE
Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-9850HE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-9850HE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-9850HE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 9 MB).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-9850HE.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,783 vs 5,990).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Core i7-9850HE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9850HE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9850HE
2019Why buy it
- ✅+3.6% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 630, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (9 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Core i7-9850HE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-9850HE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i7-9850HE
The Core i7-9850HE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,972 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-10400F and Core i7-9850HE share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i7-9850HE — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-9850HE (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-9850HE uses Coffee Lake-HR (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i7-9850HE's 9,972 — a 26.6% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,329, a 9% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 5,990 (3.5% advantage for the Core i7-9850HE). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 9 MB (total) on the Core i7-9850HE.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-9850HE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.4 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+7% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+33% | 9 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Coffee Lake-HR (2019) |
| PassMark | 13,029+31% | 9,972 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454+9% | 1,329 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | 5,990+4% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-9850HE uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and Intel QM370,Intel HM370 (Core i7-9850HE).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-9850HE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4 2666 MHz |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs true (Core i7-9850HE). The Core i7-9850HE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core i7-9850HE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core i7-9850HE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Gaming | Embedded |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













