Core i5-10400F vs Core i9-11900F

Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core i9-11900F

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2021

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-11900F.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900F across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 22,052).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Core i9-11900F mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i9-11900F

2021

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +59.7% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-11900F better than Core i5-10400F?
Yes. Core i9-11900F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 59.7% average FPS lead across 7 shared CPU game tests in our data, 69.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i9-11900F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 59.7% more average FPS across 7 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-11900F is the better fit. You are getting 69.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i9-11900F is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i9-11900F is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 59.7% average FPS lead across 7 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-11900F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-10400FCore i9-11900F
1080p
low192 FPS286 FPS
medium152 FPS256 FPS
high123 FPS217 FPS
ultra100 FPS187 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS235 FPS
medium119 FPS189 FPS
high97 FPS155 FPS
ultra79 FPS137 FPS
4K
low82 FPS164 FPS
medium70 FPS133 FPS
high55 FPS103 FPS
ultra43 FPS91 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-10400FCore i9-11900F
1080p
low326 FPS551 FPS
medium318 FPS507 FPS
high290 FPS442 FPS
ultra253 FPS390 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS551 FPS
medium292 FPS473 FPS
high267 FPS407 FPS
ultra234 FPS346 FPS
4K
low309 FPS386 FPS
medium258 FPS328 FPS
high235 FPS309 FPS
ultra199 FPS263 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-10400FCore i9-11900F
1080p
low326 FPS551 FPS
medium326 FPS551 FPS
high326 FPS551 FPS
ultra326 FPS521 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS551 FPS
medium326 FPS551 FPS
high326 FPS504 FPS
ultra326 FPS433 FPS
4K
low326 FPS535 FPS
medium326 FPS445 FPS
high289 FPS396 FPS
ultra229 FPS332 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-10400FCore i9-11900F
1080p
low326 FPS551 FPS
medium326 FPS551 FPS
high326 FPS551 FPS
ultra326 FPS551 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS551 FPS
medium326 FPS551 FPS
high326 FPS551 FPS
ultra326 FPS551 FPS
4K
low326 FPS551 FPS
medium326 FPS551 FPS
high326 FPS503 FPS
ultra326 FPS435 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i9-11900F

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Intel

Core i9-11900F

The Core i9-11900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 22,052 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i9-11900F offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-11900F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-11900F — a 17% clock advantage for the Core i9-11900F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-11900F uses Rocket Lake (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i9-11900F's 22,052 — a 51.4% lead for the Core i9-11900F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-11900F.

FeatureCore i5-10400FCore i9-11900F
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz
5.1 GHz+19%
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+16%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Rocket Lake (2021)
PassMark
13,029
22,052+69%
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,191
Geekbench 6 Single
1,454
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,783
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 3.0.

FeatureCore i5-10400FCore i9-11900F
Socket
LGA1200
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Core i9-11900F). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCore i5-10400FCore i9-11900F
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming