PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $397 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $557 MSRP).
✅Delivers 49.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 54.4 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $557 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-14901E.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-14901E across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,783 vs 14,262).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 36 MB).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i9-14901E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-14901E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i9-14901E

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +76.8% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 54.4 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($557 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Core i9-14901E

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $397 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $557 MSRP).
✅Delivers 49.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 54.4 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $557 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-14901E.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +76.8% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-14901E across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,783 vs 14,262).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 36 MB).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i9-14901E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-14901E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 54.4 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($557 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-14901E better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Core i9-14901E is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 76.8% average FPS lead across 6 shared CPU game tests in our data, 146.6% better Geekbench multi-core, 132.5% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-14901E is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 76.8% more average FPS across 6 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-14901E is the better fit. You are getting 146.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-14901E is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i9-14901E is 248.1% more expensive on MSRP at $557 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 76.8% average FPS lead across 6 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 49.7% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 54.4 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i5-10400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-14901E is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 200% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Core i9-14901E Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i9-14901E
1080p
low	192 FPS	273 FPS
medium	152 FPS	254 FPS
high	123 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	184 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	256 FPS
medium	119 FPS	214 FPS
high	97 FPS	166 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	148 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	175 FPS
medium	70 FPS	147 FPS
high	55 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	97 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i9-14901E

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i9-14901E
1080p
low	326 FPS	757 FPS
medium	318 FPS	677 FPS
high	290 FPS	549 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	479 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	659 FPS
medium	292 FPS	594 FPS
high	267 FPS	491 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	395 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	369 FPS
medium	258 FPS	337 FPS
high	235 FPS	317 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	273 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i9-14901E

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i9-14901E
1080p
low	326 FPS	757 FPS
medium	326 FPS	653 FPS
high	326 FPS	570 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	481 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	720 FPS
medium	326 FPS	587 FPS
high	326 FPS	506 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	435 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	508 FPS
medium	326 FPS	437 FPS
high	289 FPS	394 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	331 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i9-14901E

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i9-14901E
1080p
low	326 FPS	757 FPS
medium	326 FPS	757 FPS
high	326 FPS	757 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	729 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	757 FPS
medium	326 FPS	750 FPS
high	326 FPS	656 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	576 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	629 FPS
medium	326 FPS	563 FPS
high	326 FPS	499 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	436 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i9-14901E

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i9-14901E

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i9-14901E

The Core i9-14901E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,298 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i9-14901E offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-14901E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5.6 GHz on the Core i9-14901E — a 26.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-14901E (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-14901E uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i9-14901E's 30,298 — a 79.7% lead for the Core i9-14901E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 2,894, a 66.2% lead for the Core i9-14901E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 14,262 (84.6% advantage for the Core i9-14901E). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14901E.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i9-14901E
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	5.6 GHz+30%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+4%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	36 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+700%
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark	13,029	30,298+133%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	2,894+99%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	14,262+147%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i9-14901E uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-14901E — the Core i9-14901E supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-14901E supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Core i9-14901E) — the Core i9-14901E offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and Intel 600 Series,Intel 700 Series (Core i9-14901E).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i9-14901E
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-5600+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	192 GB+50%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs Yes (Core i9-14901E). The Core i9-14901E includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i9-14901E
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	Yes
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Core i9-14901E debuted at $557. On MSRP ($160 vs $557), the Core i5-10400F is $397 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 54.4 pts/$ for the Core i9-14901E — making the Core i5-10400F the 39.8% better value option.