
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 5 115U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 10 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 115U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 115U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 115U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 5 115U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,518 vs 13,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Core Ultra 5 115U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 10 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 115U.
Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 115U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 115U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,518 vs 13,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Core Ultra 5 115U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core Ultra 5 115U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core Ultra 5 115U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 94 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core Ultra 5 115U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 288 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 288 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 236 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core Ultra 5 115U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 288 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 288 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 288 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core Ultra 5 115U

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core Ultra 5 115U
Core Ultra 5 115U
The Core Ultra 5 115U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 10 MB. Memory support: DDR5 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 11,518 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 115U offers 8 cores / 10 threads — the Core Ultra 5 115U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.2 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 115U — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 115U uses Meteor Lake (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core Ultra 5 115U's 11,518 — a 12.3% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 10 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 115U.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core Ultra 5 115U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 10+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+2% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+93% | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+20% | 10 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+700% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Meteor Lake (2023) |
| PassMark | 13,029+13% | 11,518 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 5 115U uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core Ultra 5 115U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Core Ultra 5 115U). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core Ultra 5 115U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












