Core i5-10400F vs Core Ultra 5 125U

Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core Ultra 5 125U

12 Cores14 Thrd0 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 125U.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 125U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 17,152).
  • Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 125U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 125U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.

Core Ultra 5 125U

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 125U better than Core i5-10400F?
Yes. Core Ultra 5 125U is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 7.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 31.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 5 125U is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 7.2% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 125U is the better fit. You are getting 31.6% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 14 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 5 125U is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core Ultra 5 125U is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 125U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FCBGA2049 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 14 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-10400FCore Ultra 5 125U
1080p
low192 FPS181 FPS
medium152 FPS145 FPS
high123 FPS117 FPS
ultra100 FPS96 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS147 FPS
medium119 FPS116 FPS
high97 FPS93 FPS
ultra79 FPS76 FPS
4K
low82 FPS79 FPS
medium70 FPS67 FPS
high55 FPS54 FPS
ultra43 FPS42 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-10400FCore Ultra 5 125U
1080p
low326 FPS181 FPS
medium318 FPS153 FPS
high290 FPS140 FPS
ultra253 FPS123 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS160 FPS
medium292 FPS139 FPS
high267 FPS129 FPS
ultra234 FPS111 FPS
4K
low309 FPS131 FPS
medium258 FPS117 FPS
high235 FPS110 FPS
ultra199 FPS95 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-10400FCore Ultra 5 125U
1080p
low326 FPS429 FPS
medium326 FPS429 FPS
high326 FPS429 FPS
ultra326 FPS429 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS429 FPS
medium326 FPS429 FPS
high326 FPS429 FPS
ultra326 FPS413 FPS
4K
low326 FPS429 FPS
medium326 FPS380 FPS
high289 FPS331 FPS
ultra229 FPS265 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-10400FCore Ultra 5 125U
1080p
low326 FPS429 FPS
medium326 FPS429 FPS
high326 FPS429 FPS
ultra326 FPS429 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS429 FPS
medium326 FPS429 FPS
high326 FPS429 FPS
ultra326 FPS429 FPS
4K
low326 FPS429 FPS
medium326 FPS429 FPS
high326 FPS417 FPS
ultra326 FPS364 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core Ultra 5 125U

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Intel

Core Ultra 5 125U

The Core Ultra 5 125U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,152 points. Launch price was $363.

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 125U offers 12 cores / 14 threads — the Core Ultra 5 125U has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 125U — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 125U uses Meteor Lake-P (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core Ultra 5 125U's 17,152 — a 27.3% lead for the Core Ultra 5 125U. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i5-10400FCore Ultra 5 125U
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
12 / 14+100%
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+123%
1.3 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB (per core)+700%
Process
14 nm
7 nm-50%
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Meteor Lake-P (2023)
PassMark
13,029
17,152+32%
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,191
Geekbench 6 Single
1,454
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,783
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 5 125U uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-10400FCore Ultra 5 125U
Socket
LGA1200
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Core Ultra 5 125U). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCore i5-10400FCore Ultra 5 125U
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming