Core i5-10400F vs Core Ultra 5 134U

Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core Ultra 5 134U

12 Cores14 Thrd0 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +13.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 134U.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 13,169).
  • Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 134U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 134U moves to FCBGA2551 and DDR5.

Core Ultra 5 134U

2023

Why buy it

  • +1.1% higher PassMark.
  • Newer platform on FCBGA2551 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than Core Ultra 5 134U?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i5-10400F is ahead with a 13.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 134U pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 134U is the better fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 14 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-10400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-10400F is at an unclear MSRP at $160 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 13.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Core Ultra 5 134U is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 134U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FCBGA2551 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 14 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-10400FCore Ultra 5 134U
1080p
low192 FPS181 FPS
medium152 FPS146 FPS
high123 FPS118 FPS
ultra100 FPS98 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS147 FPS
medium119 FPS117 FPS
high97 FPS94 FPS
ultra79 FPS78 FPS
4K
low82 FPS82 FPS
medium70 FPS71 FPS
high55 FPS56 FPS
ultra43 FPS44 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-10400FCore Ultra 5 134U
1080p
low326 FPS198 FPS
medium318 FPS164 FPS
high290 FPS150 FPS
ultra253 FPS131 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS174 FPS
medium292 FPS148 FPS
high267 FPS138 FPS
ultra234 FPS119 FPS
4K
low309 FPS141 FPS
medium258 FPS124 FPS
high235 FPS117 FPS
ultra199 FPS101 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-10400FCore Ultra 5 134U
1080p
low326 FPS329 FPS
medium326 FPS329 FPS
high326 FPS329 FPS
ultra326 FPS329 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS329 FPS
medium326 FPS329 FPS
high326 FPS329 FPS
ultra326 FPS329 FPS
4K
low326 FPS329 FPS
medium326 FPS329 FPS
high289 FPS329 FPS
ultra229 FPS265 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-10400FCore Ultra 5 134U
1080p
low326 FPS329 FPS
medium326 FPS329 FPS
high326 FPS329 FPS
ultra326 FPS329 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS329 FPS
medium326 FPS329 FPS
high326 FPS329 FPS
ultra326 FPS329 FPS
4K
low326 FPS329 FPS
medium326 FPS329 FPS
high326 FPS329 FPS
ultra326 FPS329 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core Ultra 5 134U

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Intel

Core Ultra 5 134U

The Core Ultra 5 134U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 0.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2551. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,169 points. Launch price was $332.

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 134U offers 12 cores / 14 threads — the Core Ultra 5 134U has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 134U — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 134U (base: 2.9 GHz vs 0.7 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 134U uses Meteor Lake-U (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core Ultra 5 134U's 13,169 — a 1.1% lead for the Core Ultra 5 134U. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i5-10400FCore Ultra 5 134U
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
12 / 14+100%
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz+2%
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+314%
0.7 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB (per core)+700%
Process
14 nm
7 nm-50%
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Meteor Lake-U (2023)
PassMark
13,029
13,169+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,191
Geekbench 6 Single
1,454
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,783
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 5 134U uses FCBGA2551 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-10400FCore Ultra 5 134U
Socket
LGA1200
FCBGA2551
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Core Ultra 5 134U). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCore i5-10400FCore Ultra 5 134U
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming