PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs Core Ultra 5 225H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs Core Ultra 5 225H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 225H.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 14,526).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 225H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌225% higher power demand at 65W vs 20W.

Core Ultra 5 225H

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +48.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 20W instead of 65W, a 45W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 225H better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Core Ultra 5 225H is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 48.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 77.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 121.1% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 5 225H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 48.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 225H is the stronger fit. You are getting 77.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 14 cores and 14 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 5 225H is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core Ultra 5 225H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you a 48.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2020 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1200.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 225H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FCBGA2049 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 14 threads instead of 6/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-10400F vs Core Ultra 5 225H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core Ultra 5 225H

The Core Ultra 5 225H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 28,802 points. Launch price was $385.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225H offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225H — a 13% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225H (base: 2.9 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225H uses Arrow Lake-H (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core Ultra 5 225H's 28,802 — a 75.4% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 14,526 (55.8% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 2,678, a 59.2% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 12,337 (72.3% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225H). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225H.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core Ultra 5 225H
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	14 / 14+133%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.9 GHz+14%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	4.3 GHz+48%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	18 MB+50%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	5 nm-64%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Arrow Lake-H (2025)
PassMark	13,029	28,802+121%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	14,526+77%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	2,678+84%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	12,337+113%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 225H — the Core Ultra 5 225H supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 28 (Core Ultra 5 225H) — the Core Ultra 5 225H offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 225H).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core Ultra 5 225H
Socket	LGA1200	FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-6400+140%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	28+75%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 5 225H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 5 225H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 130T GPU), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core Ultra 5 225H targets Professional Content Creation Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Core Ultra 5 225H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core Ultra 5 225H
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel Arc 130T GPU
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	Professional Content Creation Laptop