Core i5-10400F vs Core Ultra 5 225T

Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020
Core family
·······
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 5 225T

10 Cores10 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025
Core Ultra family
·······

Core i5-10400F vs Core Ultra 5 225T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs Core Ultra 5 225T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs Core Ultra 5 225T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

  • Costs $80 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 225T.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,783 vs 8,943).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 112.0 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
  • Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 225T moves to LGA1851 and DDR5.

Core Ultra 5 225T

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +31.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Delivers 37.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.0 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($240 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
  • Newer platform on LGA1851 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
  • 50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 50% HIGHER MSRP
    $240 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 225T better than Core i5-10400F?
Yes. Core Ultra 5 225T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 31.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 54.6% better Geekbench multi-core, 106.3% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 5 225T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 31.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 225T is the stronger fit. You are getting 54.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 10 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 5 225T is the better buy right now. Core Ultra 5 225T comes in 50.0% more expensive on MSRP at $240 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you a 31.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 37.5% better value on MSRP (112.0 vs 81.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i5-10400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 225T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1851 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 10 threads instead of 6/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-10400F vs Core Ultra 5 225T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Intel

Core Ultra 5 225T

The Core Ultra 5 225T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2025 (recentemente). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,874 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225T offers 10 cores / 10 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225T — a 13% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225T (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225T uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core Ultra 5 225T's 26,874 — a 69.4% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 2,677, a 59.2% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 8,943 (42.9% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225T). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225T.

FeatureCore i5-10400FCore Ultra 5 225T
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
10 / 10+67%
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz
4.9 GHz+14%
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+16%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
20 MB (total)+67%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)+8433%
3 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
3 nm-79%
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
PassMark
13,029
26,874+106%
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,191
Geekbench 6 Single
1,454
2,677+84%
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,783
8,943+55%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225T uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 225T — the Core Ultra 5 225T supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 225T supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 24 (Core Ultra 5 225T) — the Core Ultra 5 225T offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 225T).

FeatureCore i5-10400FCore Ultra 5 225T
Socket
LGA1200
LGA1851
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
DDR5-6400+140%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
256 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
24+50%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 5 225T includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics (16EU)), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core Ultra 5 225T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Core Ultra 5 225T rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.

FeatureCore i5-10400FCore Ultra 5 225T
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Arc Graphics (16EU)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Core Ultra 5 225T came in at $240. On launch pricing ($160 vs $240), Core i5-10400F was $80 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 112.0 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 225T — making the Core Ultra 5 225T the 31.6% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-10400FCore Ultra 5 225T
MSRP
$160-33%
$240
Performance per Dollar
81.4
112.0+38%
Release Date
2020
2025

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.