
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 5 225U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 225U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,783 vs 7,846).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 225U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌364.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 14W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 225U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 5 225U
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +35.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 14W instead of 65W, a 51W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores), while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Core Ultra 5 225U
2025Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 225U.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +35.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 14W instead of 65W, a 51W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores), while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,783 vs 7,846).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 225U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌364.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 14W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 225U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 225U better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core Ultra 5 225U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core Ultra 5 225U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 335 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 358 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 296 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 188 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core Ultra 5 225U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 342 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Core Ultra 5 225U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 410 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core Ultra 5 225U

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core Ultra 5 225U
Core Ultra 5 225U
The Core Ultra 5 225U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 14 MB + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,434 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225U offers 12 cores / 14 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225U has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225U — a 11% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225U (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225U uses Arrow Lake-U (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core Ultra 5 225U's 18,434 — a 34.4% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 2,374, a 48.1% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 7,846 (30.3% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225U). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 12 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225U.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core Ultra 5 225U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 14+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.8 GHz+12% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+21% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Arrow Lake-U (2025) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 18,434+41% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | 2,374+63% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | 7,846+36% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225U uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-6400 / LPDDR5x-8400 on the Core Ultra 5 225U — the Core Ultra 5 225U supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Core Ultra 5 225U) — the Core Ultra 5 225U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and Meteor Lake SoC (Core Ultra 5 225U).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core Ultra 5 225U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-6400 / LPDDR5x-8400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core Ultra 5 225U). The Core Ultra 5 225U includes integrated graphics (Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores)), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core Ultra 5 225U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Core Ultra 5 225U rivals Ryzen 5 8640U.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Core Ultra 5 225U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x / VT-d / EPT |
| Target Use | Gaming | Productivity |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












