PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 245HX.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 245HX across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 39,605).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 245HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.

Core Ultra 5 245HX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +97.1% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA2114 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Core Ultra 5 245HX

2025

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 245HX.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +97.1% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA2114 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 245HX across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 39,605).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 245HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 245HX better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Core Ultra 5 245HX is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 97.1% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data, 204% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 5 245HX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 97.1% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 245HX is the better fit. You are getting 204% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 14 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 5 245HX is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Core Ultra 5 245HX is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 97.1% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that is mostly used-market pricing on an obsolete 2020 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a very cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1200.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 245HX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FCBGA2114 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 14 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Core Ultra 5 245HX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core Ultra 5 245HX
1080p
low	192 FPS	264 FPS
medium	152 FPS	252 FPS
high	123 FPS	213 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	181 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	222 FPS
medium	119 FPS	189 FPS
high	97 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	150 FPS
medium	70 FPS	127 FPS
high	55 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	87 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core Ultra 5 245HX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core Ultra 5 245HX
1080p
low	326 FPS	663 FPS
medium	318 FPS	560 FPS
high	290 FPS	465 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	427 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	575 FPS
medium	292 FPS	505 FPS
high	267 FPS	423 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	367 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	339 FPS
medium	258 FPS	304 FPS
high	235 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	255 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core Ultra 5 245HX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core Ultra 5 245HX
1080p
low	326 FPS	839 FPS
medium	326 FPS	685 FPS
high	326 FPS	610 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	522 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	727 FPS
medium	326 FPS	596 FPS
high	326 FPS	519 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	441 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	504 FPS
medium	326 FPS	425 FPS
high	289 FPS	382 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	323 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core Ultra 5 245HX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core Ultra 5 245HX
1080p
low	326 FPS	990 FPS
medium	326 FPS	906 FPS
high	326 FPS	786 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	714 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	820 FPS
medium	326 FPS	729 FPS
high	326 FPS	631 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	560 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	559 FPS
medium	326 FPS	505 FPS
high	326 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	399 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core Ultra 5 245HX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core Ultra 5 245HX

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core Ultra 5 245HX

The Core Ultra 5 245HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 39,605 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 245HX offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the Core Ultra 5 245HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245HX — a 17% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 245HX (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 245HX uses Arrow Lake-HX (2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core Ultra 5 245HX's 39,605 — a 101% lead for the Core Ultra 5 245HX. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245HX.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core Ultra 5 245HX
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	14 / 14+133%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	5.1 GHz+19%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.1 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	24 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	3 MB (per core)+1100%
Process	14 nm	3 nm-79%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Arrow Lake-HX (2025)
PassMark	13,029	39,605+204%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 5 245HX uses FCBGA2114 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus 6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245HX — the Core Ultra 5 245HX supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 245HX supports up to 256 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 24 (Core Ultra 5 245HX) — the Core Ultra 5 245HX offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and Arrow Lake-HX (Core Ultra 5 245HX).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core Ultra 5 245HX
Socket	LGA1200	FCBGA2114
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	6400+159900%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+52428700%	256
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	24+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 5 245HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 5 245HX includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Core Ultra 5 245HX rivals Ryzen 7 8845HS.