Core i5-10400F vs EPYC 4364P

CPU

GPU

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4364P

8 Cores16 Thrd105 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2024

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-10400F vs EPYC 4364P Performance Spectrum

Core i5-10400F

6 / 12

13,029

0.0%

34,215

+162.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs EPYC 4364P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs EPYC 4364P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $239 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 4364P.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4364P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 21,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4364P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while EPYC 4364P moves to AM5 and DDR5.

EPYC 4364P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +58.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
149.4% HIGHER MSRP
$399 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4364P better than Core i5-10400F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 4364P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4364P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 58.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4364P is the stronger fit. You are getting 156.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4364P is the better buy right now. EPYC 4364P comes in 149.4% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you a 58.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 5.3% better value on MSRP (85.8 vs 81.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4364P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB), more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-10400F vs EPYC 4364P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

EPYC 4364P

The EPYC 4364P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,215 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the EPYC 4364P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 4364P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4364P — a 22.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 4364P (base: 2.9 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 4364P uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the EPYC 4364P's 34,215 — a 89.7% lead for the EPYC 4364P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 21,000 (87.8% advantage for the EPYC 4364P). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 3,085, a 71.9% lead for the EPYC 4364P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 15,594 (91.8% advantage for the EPYC 4364P). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4364P.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	EPYC 4364P
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	5.4 GHz+26%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	4.5 GHz+55%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+167%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	5 nm-64%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Raphael (2023−2025)
PassMark	13,029	34,215+163%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	21,000+156%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	3,085+112%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	15,594+170%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 4364P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4364P — the EPYC 4364P supports 95% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4364P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 28 (EPYC 4364P) — the EPYC 4364P offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4364P).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	EPYC 4364P
Socket	LGA1200	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-5200+95%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	192 GB+50%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	28+75%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 4364P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4364P). The EPYC 4364P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, EPYC 4364P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; EPYC 4364P rivals Xeon E-2488.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	EPYC 4364P
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V, AMD-Vi
Target Use	Gaming	Entry Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the EPYC 4364P came in at $399. On launch pricing ($160 vs $399), Core i5-10400F was $239 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 85.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 4364P — making the EPYC 4364P the 5.2% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	EPYC 4364P
MSRP	$160-60%	$399
Performance per Dollar	81.4	85.8+5%
Release Date	2020	2024

Search Core i5-10400F on Amazon

Search EPYC 4364P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.