Core i5-10400F vs EPYC 4585PX

CPU

GPU

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4585PX

16 Cores32 Thrd170 WWMax: 5.7 GHz2025

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-10400F vs EPYC 4585PX Performance Spectrum

Core i5-10400F

6 / 12

13,029

0.0%

70,563

+441.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs EPYC 4585PX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs EPYC 4585PX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $539 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 170W, a 105W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 4585PX.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4585PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 70,563).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4585PX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 100.9 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while EPYC 4585PX moves to AM5 and DDR5.

EPYC 4585PX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +59.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Delivers 24.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 100.9 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
336.9% HIGHER MSRP
$699 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
❌161.5% higher power demand at 170W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4585PX better than Core i5-10400F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 4585PX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4585PX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 59.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 128 MB versus 12 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4585PX is the stronger fit. You are getting 441.6% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 966.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4585PX is the better buy right now. EPYC 4585PX comes in 336.9% more expensive on MSRP at $699 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you a 59.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 24.0% better value on MSRP (100.9 vs 81.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4585PX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2020), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 12 MB, more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 6/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-10400F vs EPYC 4585PX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

EPYC 4585PX

The EPYC 4585PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 70,563 points. Launch price was $699.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the EPYC 4585PX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 4585PX has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4585PX — a 28% clock advantage for the EPYC 4585PX (base: 2.9 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 4585PX uses Grado (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the EPYC 4585PX's 70,563 — a 137.7% lead for the EPYC 4585PX. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4585PX.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	EPYC 4585PX
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	16 / 32+167%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	5.7 GHz+33%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	4.3 GHz+48%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	128 MB (total)+967%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Grado (2025)
PassMark	13,029	70,563+442%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 4585PX uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus 5600 on the EPYC 4585PX — the EPYC 4585PX supports 110.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4585PX supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 28 (EPYC 4585PX) — the EPYC 4585PX offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and AM5 (EPYC 4585PX).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	EPYC 4585PX
Socket	LGA1200	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	5600+110%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	256 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	28+75%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 4585PX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4585PX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4585PX). The EPYC 4585PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; EPYC 4585PX rivals Core Ultra 9 285K.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	EPYC 4585PX
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	AMD Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the EPYC 4585PX came in at $699. On launch pricing ($160 vs $699), Core i5-10400F was $539 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 100.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 4585PX — making the EPYC 4585PX the 21.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	EPYC 4585PX
MSRP	$160-77%	$699
Performance per Dollar	81.4	100.9+24%
Release Date	2020	2025

Search Core i5-10400F on Amazon

Search EPYC 4585PX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.