Core i5-10400F vs EPYC 8534P

CPU

GPU

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Popular choices:

•••••••••

EPYC 8534P

64 Cores128 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i5-10400F

6 / 12

13,029

0.0%

71,900

+451.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 7900

Ryzen 9 9955HX

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,369 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
✅Delivers 526.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 8534P.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 8534P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,783 vs 18,882).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8534P, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while EPYC 8534P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

EPYC 8534P

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +64.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅500% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($5,529 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

EPYC 8534P

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,369 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
✅Delivers 526.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $5,529 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 8534P.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +64.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅500% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 8534P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,783 vs 18,882).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8534P, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while EPYC 8534P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($5,529 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 8534P better than Core i5-10400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 8534P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 8534P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 64.5% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 128 MB vs 12 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8534P is the better fit. You are getting 226.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 966.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 8534P is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 8534P is 3355.6% more expensive on MSRP at $5,529 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 64.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 526.2% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 13.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8534P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 12 MB, more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 6/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

EPYC 8534P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	EPYC 8534P
1080p
low	192 FPS	159 FPS
medium	152 FPS	131 FPS
high	123 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	87 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	142 FPS
medium	119 FPS	114 FPS
high	97 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	68 FPS
medium	70 FPS	58 FPS
high	55 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	37 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open EPYC 8534P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	EPYC 8534P
1080p
low	326 FPS	415 FPS
medium	318 FPS	365 FPS
high	290 FPS	297 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	233 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	341 FPS
medium	292 FPS	308 FPS
high	267 FPS	258 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	196 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	210 FPS
medium	258 FPS	193 FPS
high	235 FPS	162 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	130 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open EPYC 8534P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	EPYC 8534P
1080p
low	326 FPS	860 FPS
medium	326 FPS	786 FPS
high	326 FPS	760 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	682 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	663 FPS
medium	326 FPS	587 FPS
high	326 FPS	558 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	498 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	435 FPS
medium	326 FPS	344 FPS
high	289 FPS	307 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	250 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open EPYC 8534P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	EPYC 8534P
1080p
low	326 FPS	1022 FPS
medium	326 FPS	912 FPS
high	326 FPS	771 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	651 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	832 FPS
medium	326 FPS	711 FPS
high	326 FPS	597 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	491 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	599 FPS
medium	326 FPS	523 FPS
high	326 FPS	451 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	375 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open EPYC 8534P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and EPYC 8534P

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

EPYC 8534P

The EPYC 8534P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 71,900 points. Launch price was $4,950.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the EPYC 8534P offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 8534P has 58 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 8534P — a 32.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 8534P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the EPYC 8534P's 71,900 — a 138.6% lead for the EPYC 8534P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,678, a 14.3% lead for the EPYC 8534P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 18,882 (106.2% advantage for the EPYC 8534P). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8534P.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	EPYC 8534P
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	64 / 128+967%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+39%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+26%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	128 MB (total)+967%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+300%
Process	14 nm	5 nm-64%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark	13,029	71,900+452%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	1,678+15%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	18,882+227%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 8534P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 8534P — the EPYC 8534P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 8534P supports up to 1152 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 160% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-10400F) vs 6 (EPYC 8534P). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 96 (EPYC 8534P) — the EPYC 8534P offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and SP6 (EPYC 8534P).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	EPYC 8534P
Socket	LGA1200	SP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-4800+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1152 GB+800%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	96+500%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 8534P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs AMD-V (EPYC 8534P). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, EPYC 8534P targets Cloud Server. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; EPYC 8534P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	EPYC 8534P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	Cloud Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the EPYC 8534P debuted at $5529. On MSRP ($160 vs $5529), the Core i5-10400F is $5369 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 13.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 8534P — making the Core i5-10400F the 144.9% better value option.