Core i5-10400F vs EPYC Embedded 8224P

CPU

GPU

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC Embedded 8224P

24 Cores48 Thrd160 WWMax: 3 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-10400F vs EPYC Embedded 8224P Performance Spectrum

Core i5-10400F

6 / 12

13,029

0.0%

48,869

+275.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs EPYC Embedded 8224P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs EPYC Embedded 8224P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $695 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
✅Delivers 42.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 57.2 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 160W, a 95W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC Embedded 8224P.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC Embedded 8224P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 48,869).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC Embedded 8224P, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while EPYC Embedded 8224P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

EPYC Embedded 8224P

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅500% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.2 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($855 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌146.2% higher power demand at 160W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC Embedded 8224P better than Core i5-10400F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC Embedded 8224P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC Embedded 8224P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 23.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC Embedded 8224P is the stronger fit. You are getting 275.1% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC Embedded 8224P is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC Embedded 8224P comes in 434.4% more expensive on MSRP at $855 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you a 23.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 42.5% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 57.2 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC Embedded 8224P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB), more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 6/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-10400F vs EPYC Embedded 8224P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

EPYC Embedded 8224P

The EPYC Embedded 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,869 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the EPYC Embedded 8224P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC Embedded 8224P has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 3 GHz on the EPYC Embedded 8224P — a 35.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.55 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the EPYC Embedded 8224P's 48,869 — a 115.8% lead for the EPYC Embedded 8224P. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC Embedded 8224P.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	EPYC Embedded 8224P
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	24 / 48+300%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+43%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+14%	2.55 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+433%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	5 nm-64%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark	13,029	48,869+275%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus 4800 on the EPYC Embedded 8224P — the EPYC Embedded 8224P supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC Embedded 8224P supports up to 1152 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 800% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-10400F) vs 6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 96 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) — the EPYC Embedded 8224P offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and SP6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	EPYC Embedded 8224P
Socket	LGA1200	SP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	4800+80%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1152 GB+800%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	96+500%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC Embedded 8224P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC Embedded 8224P). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; EPYC Embedded 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	EPYC Embedded 8224P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the EPYC Embedded 8224P came in at $855. On launch pricing ($160 vs $855), Core i5-10400F was $695 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 57.2 pts/$ for the EPYC Embedded 8224P — making the Core i5-10400F the 35% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	EPYC Embedded 8224P
MSRP	$160-81%	$855
Performance per Dollar	81.4+42%	57.2
Release Date	2020	2023

Search Core i5-10400F on Amazon

Search EPYC Embedded 8224P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.