
Core i5-10400F

FX-4350
Core i5-10400F vs FX-4350 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-10400F vs FX-4350 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-10400F vs FX-4350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +136.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Delivers 212.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 26.1 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β31.1% HIGHER MSRP$160 MSRPvs$122 MSRP
FX-4350
2013Why buy it
- β Costs $38 less on MSRP ($122 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower Geekbench multi-core (1,289 vs 5,783).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 26.1 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($122 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- β92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than FX-4350?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10400F vs FX-4350 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020β2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

FX-4350
The FX-4350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012β2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,184 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the FX-4350 offers 4 cores / 4 threads β the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.3 GHz on the FX-4350 β identical boost frequencies (base: 2.9 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020β2025) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-4350 uses Vishera (2012β2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the FX-4350's 3,184 β a 121.4% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 1,454 vs 504, a 97% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 1,289 (127.1% advantage for the Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 4.2 GHz+45% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | β |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 4096 kB+1500% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020β2025) | Vishera (2012β2015) |
| PassMark | 13,029+309% | 3,184 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454+188% | 504 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783+349% | 1,289 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-4350 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR3-1866 on the FX-4350 β the Core i5-10400F supports 42.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB β 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and AMD 970,990X,990FX (FX-4350).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+43% | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+300% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the FX-4350 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs AMD-V (FX-4350). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, FX-4350 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the FX-4350 came in at $122. On launch pricing ($160 vs $122), FX-4350 was $38 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 26.1 pts/$ for the FX-4350 β making the Core i5-10400F the 102.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160 | $122-24% |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4+212% | 26.1 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















