Core i5-10400F vs M2 Pro

CPU

GPU

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Popular choices:

•••••••••

M2 Pro

12 Cores12 Thrd36 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i5-10400F

6 / 12

13,029

0.0%

21,939

+68.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike M2 Pro.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than M2 Pro across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,783 vs 14,450).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while M2 Pro mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌80.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 36W.

M2 Pro

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +33.4% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 36W instead of 65W, a 29W reduction.
✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M2 Pro GPU, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

M2 Pro

2023

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike M2 Pro.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +33.4% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 36W instead of 65W, a 29W reduction.
✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M2 Pro GPU, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than M2 Pro across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,783 vs 14,450).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while M2 Pro mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌80.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 36W.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is M2 Pro better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. M2 Pro is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 33.4% average FPS lead across 7 shared CPU game tests in our data, 149.9% better Geekbench multi-core, 68.4% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, M2 Pro is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 33.4% more average FPS across 7 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, M2 Pro is the better fit. You are getting 149.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 12 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

M2 Pro is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. M2 Pro is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 33.4% average FPS lead across 7 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i5-10400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

M2 Pro is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with none and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

M2 Pro Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	M2 Pro
1080p
low	192 FPS	176 FPS
medium	152 FPS	142 FPS
high	123 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	91 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	141 FPS
medium	119 FPS	111 FPS
high	97 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	70 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	66 FPS
medium	70 FPS	56 FPS
high	55 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	35 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open M2 Pro

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	M2 Pro
1080p
low	326 FPS	380 FPS
medium	318 FPS	327 FPS
high	290 FPS	269 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	216 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	324 FPS
medium	292 FPS	289 FPS
high	267 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	192 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	208 FPS
medium	258 FPS	188 FPS
high	235 FPS	161 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	128 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open M2 Pro

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	M2 Pro
1080p
low	326 FPS	548 FPS
medium	326 FPS	548 FPS
high	326 FPS	548 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	545 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	548 FPS
medium	326 FPS	478 FPS
high	326 FPS	439 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	382 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	420 FPS
medium	326 FPS	326 FPS
high	289 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	231 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open M2 Pro

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	M2 Pro
1080p
low	326 FPS	548 FPS
medium	326 FPS	548 FPS
high	326 FPS	548 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	548 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	548 FPS
medium	326 FPS	548 FPS
high	326 FPS	525 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	451 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	476 FPS
medium	326 FPS	426 FPS
high	326 FPS	380 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	332 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open M2 Pro

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and M2 Pro

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

M2 Pro

The M2 Pro is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.42 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,939 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the M2 Pro offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the M2 Pro has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 3.5 GHz on the M2 Pro — a 20.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.42 GHz). The Core i5-10400F is built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the M2 Pro's 21,939 — a 51% lead for the M2 Pro. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 2,650, a 58.3% lead for the M2 Pro that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 14,450 (85.7% advantage for the M2 Pro). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 24 MB on the M2 Pro.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	M2 Pro
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	12 / 12+100%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+23%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+20%	2.42 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	24 MB+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	36 MB+14300%
Process	14 nm	5 nm-64%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	—
PassMark	13,029	21,939+68%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	2,650+82%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	14,450+150%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the M2 Pro uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus LPDDR5-6400 on the M2 Pro — the M2 Pro supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 0 (M2 Pro) — the Core i5-10400F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and Apple Silicon (M2 Pro).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	M2 Pro
Socket	LGA1200	none
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	LPDDR5-6400+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+300%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs ARM Virtualization (M2 Pro). The M2 Pro includes integrated graphics (Apple M2 Pro GPU), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, M2 Pro targets Professional Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.