Core i5-10400F vs M3 Max 14-Core

Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020
Core family
·······
VS

M3 Max 14-Core

14 Cores14 ThrdWMax: 4.06 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-10400F vs M3 Max 14-Core Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs M3 Max 14-Core FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs M3 Max 14-Core: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike M3 Max 14-Core.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than M3 Max 14-Core across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 36,529).
  • Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while M3 Max 14-Core mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while M3 Max 14-Core moves to none and DDR5.
  • No integrated graphics, while M3 Max 14-Core can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

M3 Max 14-Core

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +14.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M3 Max GPU (30-core), while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is M3 Max 14-Core better than Core i5-10400F?
Yes. M3 Max 14-Core is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 180.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, M3 Max 14-Core is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, M3 Max 14-Core is the stronger fit. You are getting 180.4% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 14 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
M3 Max 14-Core is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. M3 Max 14-Core comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i5-10400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
M3 Max 14-Core makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with none and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 14 threads instead of 6/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-10400F vs M3 Max 14-Core Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

M3 Max 14-Core

The M3 Max 14-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2023 (2 years ago). It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.748 GHz, with boost up to 4.06 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,529 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the M3 Max 14-Core offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the M3 Max 14-Core has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.06 GHz on the M3 Max 14-Core — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.748 GHz). The Core i5-10400F is built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the M3 Max 14-Core's 36,529 — a 94.8% lead for the M3 Max 14-Core.

FeatureCore i5-10400FM3 Max 14-Core
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
14 / 14+133%
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz+6%
4.06 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+6%
2.748 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
3 nm-79%
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark
13,029
36,529+180%
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,191
Geekbench 6 Single
1,454
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,783
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the M3 Max 14-Core uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus 6400 on the M3 Max 14-Core — the M3 Max 14-Core supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-10400F) vs 0 (M3 Max 14-Core). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 0 (M3 Max 14-Core) — the Core i5-10400F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and Apple M3 (M3 Max 14-Core).

FeatureCore i5-10400FM3 Max 14-Core
Socket
LGA1200
none
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
6400+140%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+33%
96 GB
RAM Channels
2
0
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M3 Max 14-Core). The M3 Max 14-Core includes integrated graphics (Apple M3 Max GPU (30-core)), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; M3 Max 14-Core rivals Core i9-13900HX.

FeatureCore i5-10400FM3 Max 14-Core
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Apple M3 Max GPU (30-core)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d (macOS)
Target Use
Gaming