
Core i5-10400F

M3 Max 14-Core
Core i5-10400F vs M3 Max 14-Core Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-10400F vs M3 Max 14-Core FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-10400F vs M3 Max 14-Core: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike M3 Max 14-Core.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than M3 Max 14-Core across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 36,529).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while M3 Max 14-Core mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while M3 Max 14-Core moves to none and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while M3 Max 14-Core can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
M3 Max 14-Core
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M3 Max GPU (30-core), while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is M3 Max 14-Core better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10400F vs M3 Max 14-Core Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
M3 Max 14-Core
The M3 Max 14-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2023 (2 years ago). It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.748 GHz, with boost up to 4.06 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,529 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the M3 Max 14-Core offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the M3 Max 14-Core has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.06 GHz on the M3 Max 14-Core — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.748 GHz). The Core i5-10400F is built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the M3 Max 14-Core's 36,529 — a 94.8% lead for the M3 Max 14-Core.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | M3 Max 14-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 14 / 14+133% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+6% | 4.06 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+6% | 2.748 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm | 3 nm-79% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | — |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 36,529+180% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the M3 Max 14-Core uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus 6400 on the M3 Max 14-Core — the M3 Max 14-Core supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-10400F) vs 0 (M3 Max 14-Core). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 0 (M3 Max 14-Core) — the Core i5-10400F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and Apple M3 (M3 Max 14-Core).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | M3 Max 14-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | 6400+140% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+33% | 96 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 0 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M3 Max 14-Core). The M3 Max 14-Core includes integrated graphics (Apple M3 Max GPU (30-core)), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; M3 Max 14-Core rivals Core i9-13900HX.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | M3 Max 14-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Apple M3 Max GPU (30-core) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d (macOS) |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













