Core i5-10400F vs M4 Max (16 cores)

CPU

GPU

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Popular choices:

•••••••••

M4 Max (16 cores)

16 Cores16 Thrd4 WWMax: 4.51 GHz2024

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i5-10400F

6 / 12

13,029

0.0%

43,985

+237.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike M4 Max (16 cores).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than M4 Max (16 cores) across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,783 vs 26,675).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while M4 Max (16 cores) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while M4 Max (16 cores) moves to none and DDR5.

M4 Max (16 cores)

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +58.4% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅150% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Apple 40-core GPU, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

M4 Max (16 cores)

2024

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike M4 Max (16 cores).

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +58.4% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅150% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Apple 40-core GPU, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than M4 Max (16 cores) across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,783 vs 26,675).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while M4 Max (16 cores) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while M4 Max (16 cores) moves to none and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is M4 Max (16 cores) better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. M4 Max (16 cores) is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 58.4% average FPS lead across 6 shared CPU game tests in our data, 361.3% better Geekbench multi-core, 237.6% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, M4 Max (16 cores) is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 58.4% more average FPS across 6 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, M4 Max (16 cores) is the better fit. You are getting 361.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

M4 Max (16 cores) is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. M4 Max (16 cores) is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 58.4% average FPS lead across 6 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i5-10400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

M4 Max (16 cores) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with none and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

M4 Max (16 cores) Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	M4 Max (16 cores)
1080p
low	192 FPS	180 FPS
medium	152 FPS	145 FPS
high	123 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	97 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	146 FPS
medium	119 FPS	115 FPS
high	97 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	80 FPS
medium	70 FPS	69 FPS
high	55 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	43 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open M4 Max (16 cores)

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	M4 Max (16 cores)
1080p
low	326 FPS	465 FPS
medium	318 FPS	383 FPS
high	290 FPS	327 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	288 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	400 FPS
medium	292 FPS	343 FPS
high	267 FPS	299 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	254 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	278 FPS
medium	258 FPS	245 FPS
high	235 FPS	226 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	196 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open M4 Max (16 cores)

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	M4 Max (16 cores)
1080p
low	326 FPS	812 FPS
medium	326 FPS	655 FPS
high	326 FPS	593 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	518 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	632 FPS
medium	326 FPS	516 FPS
high	326 FPS	468 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	404 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	466 FPS
medium	326 FPS	368 FPS
high	289 FPS	331 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	264 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open M4 Max (16 cores)

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	M4 Max (16 cores)
1080p
low	326 FPS	1026 FPS
medium	326 FPS	924 FPS
high	326 FPS	809 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	718 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	817 FPS
medium	326 FPS	718 FPS
high	326 FPS	629 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	553 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	562 FPS
medium	326 FPS	503 FPS
high	326 FPS	453 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	399 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open M4 Max (16 cores)

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and M4 Max (16 cores)

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

M4 Max (16 cores)

The M4 Max (16 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 4.51 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 43,985 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the M4 Max (16 cores) offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the M4 Max (16 cores) has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.51 GHz on the M4 Max (16 cores) — a 4.8% clock advantage for the M4 Max (16 cores) (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.75 GHz). The Core i5-10400F is built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the M4 Max (16 cores)'s 43,985 — a 108.6% lead for the M4 Max (16 cores). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 4,060, a 94.5% lead for the M4 Max (16 cores) that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 26,675 (128.7% advantage for the M4 Max (16 cores)).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	M4 Max (16 cores)
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	16 / 16+167%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.51 GHz+5%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+5%	2.75 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	3 nm-79%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	—
PassMark	13,029	43,985+238%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	4,060+179%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	26,675+361%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the M4 Max (16 cores) uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-10400F) vs 8 (M4 Max (16 cores)). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 40 (M4 Max (16 cores)) — the M4 Max (16 cores) offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and Apple Silicon (M4 Max (16 cores)).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	M4 Max (16 cores)
Socket	LGA1200	none
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	Unified Memory
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	40+150%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs Apple Virtualization (M4 Max (16 cores)). The M4 Max (16 cores) includes integrated graphics (Apple 40-core GPU), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, M4 Max (16 cores) targets Professional Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; M4 Max (16 cores) rivals Ryzen AI Max PRO 390.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	M4 Max (16 cores)
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Apple 40-core GPU
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	Apple Virtualization
Target Use	Gaming	Professional Laptop