Core i5-10400F vs M4 Max (16 cores)

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs M4 Max (16 cores) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs M4 Max (16 cores): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike M4 Max (16 cores).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than M4 Max (16 cores) across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,783 vs 26,675).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while M4 Max (16 cores) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while M4 Max (16 cores) moves to none and DDR5.

M4 Max (16 cores)

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅150% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Apple 40-core GPU, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is M4 Max (16 cores) better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. M4 Max (16 cores) is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 23.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 361.3% better Geekbench multi-core, 237.6% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, M4 Max (16 cores) is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 23.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, M4 Max (16 cores) is the stronger fit. You are getting 361.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

M4 Max (16 cores) is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. M4 Max (16 cores) comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you a 23.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i5-10400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

M4 Max (16 cores) makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with none and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-10400F vs M4 Max (16 cores) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

M4 Max (16 cores)

The M4 Max (16 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 4.51 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 43,985 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the M4 Max (16 cores) offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the M4 Max (16 cores) has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.51 GHz on the M4 Max (16 cores) — a 4.8% clock advantage for the M4 Max (16 cores) (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.75 GHz). The Core i5-10400F is built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the M4 Max (16 cores)'s 43,985 — a 108.6% lead for the M4 Max (16 cores). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 4,060, a 94.5% lead for the M4 Max (16 cores) that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 26,675 (128.7% advantage for the M4 Max (16 cores)).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	M4 Max (16 cores)
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	16 / 16+167%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.51 GHz+5%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+5%	2.75 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	3 nm-79%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	—
PassMark	13,029	43,985+238%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	4,060+179%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	26,675+361%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the M4 Max (16 cores) uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-10400F) vs 8 (M4 Max (16 cores)). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 40 (M4 Max (16 cores)) — the M4 Max (16 cores) offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and Apple Silicon (M4 Max (16 cores)).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	M4 Max (16 cores)
Socket	LGA1200	none
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	Unified Memory
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	40+150%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs Apple Virtualization (M4 Max (16 cores)). The M4 Max (16 cores) includes integrated graphics (Apple 40-core GPU), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, M4 Max (16 cores) targets Professional Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; M4 Max (16 cores) rivals Ryzen AI Max PRO 390.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	M4 Max (16 cores)
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Apple 40-core GPU
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	Apple Virtualization
Target Use	Gaming	Professional Laptop