Core i5-10400F vs MediaTek Kompanio 838

Core i5-10400F vs MediaTek Kompanio 838 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-10400F

6 / 12

13,029

+143.9%

MediaTek Kompanio 838

8 / 8

5,343

0.0%

Core i5-6200U

Athlon X4 950

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Core i7-3632QM

Ryzen Z2 Extreme

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs MediaTek Kompanio 838 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs MediaTek Kompanio 838: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +57.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike MediaTek Kompanio 838.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while MediaTek Kompanio 838 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

MediaTek Kompanio 838

2024

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,343 vs 13,029).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than MediaTek Kompanio 838?

Yes. Core i5-10400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 57.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 143.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 57.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 143.9% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-10400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-10400F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $160 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 57.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

MediaTek Kompanio 838 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-10400F vs MediaTek Kompanio 838 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

MediaTek Kompanio 838

The MediaTek Kompanio 838 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in 31 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,343 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the MediaTek Kompanio 838 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the MediaTek Kompanio 838 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 2.2 GHz on the MediaTek Kompanio 838 — a 64.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the MediaTek Kompanio 838 uses Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the MediaTek Kompanio 838's 5,343 — a 83.7% lead for the Core i5-10400F.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	MediaTek Kompanio 838
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 8+33%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+95%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+45%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	—
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024)
PassMark	13,029+144%	5,343
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (MediaTek Kompanio 838). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.