
Core i5-10400F

Mobile Pentium 4 2.66
Core i5-10400F vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-10400F vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-10400F vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.66: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +1628.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 66W, a 1W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Mobile Pentium 4 2.66.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Mobile Pentium 4 2.66
2003Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (800 vs 5,783).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Mobile Pentium 4 2.66?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10400F vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.66
The Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 66 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 395 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 offers 1 cores / 2 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 5 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 2.67 GHz on the Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 — a 46.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F. The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 uses Northwood (2002−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Mobile Pentium 4 2.66's 395 — a 188.2% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 800, a 58% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 800 (151.4% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 0 kB on the Mobile Pentium 4 2.66.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+500% | 1 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+61% | 2.67 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB+100% |
| Process | 14 nm-89% | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Northwood (2002−2004) |
| PassMark | 13,029+3198% | 395 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454+82% | 800 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783+623% | 800 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR2 on the Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 — the Core i5-10400F supports 133200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-10400F) vs 1 (Mobile Pentium 4 2.66). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 0 (Mobile Pentium 4 2.66) — the Core i5-10400F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and 852PM,855PM (Mobile Pentium 4 2.66).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+133200% | DDR2 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+3100% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs None (Mobile Pentium 4 2.66). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | None |
| Target Use | Gaming | Legacy Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













