Core i5-10400F vs N250

Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

N250

4 Cores4 ThrdWMax: 3.8 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +98.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike N250.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while N250 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while N250 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

N250

2025

Why buy it

  • Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (4,773 vs 13,029).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than N250?
Yes. Core i5-10400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 98.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 173% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 98.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the better fit. You are getting 173% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-10400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-10400F is at an unclear MSRP at $160 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 98.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
N250 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2020) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-10400FN250
1080p
low192 FPS119 FPS
medium152 FPS119 FPS
high123 FPS113 FPS
ultra100 FPS88 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS119 FPS
medium119 FPS115 FPS
high97 FPS91 FPS
ultra79 FPS71 FPS
4K
low82 FPS69 FPS
medium70 FPS58 FPS
high55 FPS46 FPS
ultra43 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-10400FN250
1080p
low326 FPS119 FPS
medium318 FPS119 FPS
high290 FPS119 FPS
ultra253 FPS119 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS119 FPS
medium292 FPS119 FPS
high267 FPS119 FPS
ultra234 FPS119 FPS
4K
low309 FPS119 FPS
medium258 FPS119 FPS
high235 FPS110 FPS
ultra199 FPS84 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-10400FN250
1080p
low326 FPS119 FPS
medium326 FPS119 FPS
high326 FPS119 FPS
ultra326 FPS119 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS119 FPS
medium326 FPS119 FPS
high326 FPS119 FPS
ultra326 FPS119 FPS
4K
low326 FPS119 FPS
medium326 FPS119 FPS
high289 FPS119 FPS
ultra229 FPS119 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-10400FN250
1080p
low326 FPS119 FPS
medium326 FPS119 FPS
high326 FPS119 FPS
ultra326 FPS119 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS119 FPS
medium326 FPS119 FPS
high326 FPS119 FPS
ultra326 FPS119 FPS
4K
low326 FPS119 FPS
medium326 FPS119 FPS
high326 FPS119 FPS
ultra326 FPS119 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and N250

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Intel

N250

The N250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Memory support: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 4,773 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the N250 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 3.8 GHz on the N250 — a 12.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F. The Core i5-10400F is built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the N250's 4,773 — a 92.8% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the N250.

FeatureCore i5-10400FN250
Cores / Threads
6 / 12+50%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz+13%
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+100%
6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark
13,029+173%
4,773
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,191
Geekbench 6 Single
1,454
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,783
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the N250 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-10400FN250
Socket
LGA1200
FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (N250). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCore i5-10400FN250
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming