
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Pentium 3825U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +617.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium 3825U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Pentium 3825U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Pentium 3825U
2015Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,396 vs 13,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Pentium 3825U
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +617.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium 3825U.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Pentium 3825U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,396 vs 13,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Pentium 3825U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Pentium 3825U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Pentium 3825U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Pentium 3825U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 35 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Pentium 3825U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 35 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Pentium 3825U

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Pentium 3825U
Pentium 3825U
The Pentium 3825U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,396 points. Launch price was $161.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Pentium 3825U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 1.9 GHz on the Pentium 3825U — a 77.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium 3825U uses Broadwell-U (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Pentium 3825U's 1,396 — a 161.3% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 3825U.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Pentium 3825U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+200% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+126% | 1.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+53% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+500% | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Broadwell-U (2015) |
| PassMark | 13,029+833% | 1,396 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium 3825U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Pentium 3825U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FCBGA1168 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Pentium 3825U). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Pentium 3825U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












