Core i5-10400F vs Pentium 3825U

Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Pentium 3825U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2015

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +617.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).
  • Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium 3825U.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Pentium 3825U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Pentium 3825U

2015

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (1,396 vs 13,029).
    • Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 12 MB).
    • 687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
    • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i5-10400F better than Pentium 3825U?
    Yes. Core i5-10400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 617.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 833.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 617.9% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the better fit. You are getting 833.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i5-10400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-10400F is at an unclear MSRP at $160 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 617.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core i5-10400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2015), 500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Games Benchmarks

    Paired with RTX 4090

    To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

    Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

    Path of Exile 2

    Path of Exile 2

    PresetCore i5-10400FPentium 3825U
    1080p
    low192 FPS35 FPS
    medium152 FPS35 FPS
    high123 FPS35 FPS
    ultra100 FPS35 FPS
    1440p
    low153 FPS35 FPS
    medium119 FPS35 FPS
    high97 FPS35 FPS
    ultra79 FPS35 FPS
    4K
    low82 FPS35 FPS
    medium70 FPS35 FPS
    high55 FPS35 FPS
    ultra43 FPS33 FPS
    Counter-Strike 2

    Counter-Strike 2

    PresetCore i5-10400FPentium 3825U
    1080p
    low326 FPS35 FPS
    medium318 FPS35 FPS
    high290 FPS35 FPS
    ultra253 FPS35 FPS
    1440p
    low326 FPS35 FPS
    medium292 FPS35 FPS
    high267 FPS35 FPS
    ultra234 FPS35 FPS
    4K
    low309 FPS35 FPS
    medium258 FPS35 FPS
    high235 FPS28 FPS
    ultra199 FPS20 FPS
    League of Legends

    League of Legends

    PresetCore i5-10400FPentium 3825U
    1080p
    low326 FPS35 FPS
    medium326 FPS35 FPS
    high326 FPS35 FPS
    ultra326 FPS35 FPS
    1440p
    low326 FPS35 FPS
    medium326 FPS35 FPS
    high326 FPS35 FPS
    ultra326 FPS35 FPS
    4K
    low326 FPS35 FPS
    medium326 FPS35 FPS
    high289 FPS35 FPS
    ultra229 FPS35 FPS
    Valorant

    Valorant

    PresetCore i5-10400FPentium 3825U
    1080p
    low326 FPS35 FPS
    medium326 FPS35 FPS
    high326 FPS35 FPS
    ultra326 FPS35 FPS
    1440p
    low326 FPS35 FPS
    medium326 FPS35 FPS
    high326 FPS35 FPS
    ultra326 FPS35 FPS
    4K
    low326 FPS35 FPS
    medium326 FPS35 FPS
    high326 FPS35 FPS
    ultra326 FPS35 FPS

    Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Pentium 3825U

    Intel

    Core i5-10400F

    The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

    Intel

    Pentium 3825U

    The Pentium 3825U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,396 points. Launch price was $161.

    Processing Power

    The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Pentium 3825U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 1.9 GHz on the Pentium 3825U — a 77.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium 3825U uses Broadwell-U (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Pentium 3825U's 1,396 — a 161.3% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 3825U.

    FeatureCore i5-10400FPentium 3825U
    Cores / Threads
    6 / 12+200%
    2 / 4
    Boost Clock
    4.3 GHz+126%
    1.9 GHz
    Base Clock
    2.9 GHz+53%
    1.9 GHz
    L3 Cache
    12 MB (total)+500%
    2 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    256K (per core)
    256K (per core)
    Process
    14 nm
    14 nm
    Architecture
    Comet Lake (2020−2025)
    Broadwell-U (2015)
    PassMark
    13,029+833%
    1,396
    Cinebench R23 Multi
    8,191
    Geekbench 6 Single
    1,454
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    5,783
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium 3825U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i5-10400FPentium 3825U
    Socket
    LGA1200
    FCBGA1168
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR4-2666
    Max RAM Capacity
    128 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Pentium 3825U). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

    FeatureCore i5-10400FPentium 3825U
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d
    Target Use
    Gaming