
Core i5-10400F

Pentium 4 2.80
Core i5-10400F vs Pentium 4 2.80 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-10400F vs Pentium 4 2.80 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

ARC Raiders

Dead by Daylight

Deadlock

Delta Force
Core i5-10400F vs Pentium 4 2.80: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +1815.9% higher average FPS across 27 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $167 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $327 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 6426.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 1.2 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $327 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 110W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Pentium 4 2.80
2002Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 27 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (408 vs 13,029).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($327 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ❌69.2% higher power demand at 110W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Pentium 4 2.80?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10400F vs Pentium 4 2.80 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Pentium 4 2.80
The Pentium 4 2.80 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.79 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 408 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Pentium 4 2.80 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 5 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 2.79 GHz on the Pentium 4 2.80 — a 42.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F. The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium 4 2.80 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Pentium 4 2.80's 408 — a 187.9% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 0 kB on the Pentium 4 2.80.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Pentium 4 2.80 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+500% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+54% | 2.79 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB+100% |
| Process | 14 nm-89% | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | NetBurst (2000−2006) |
| PassMark | 13,029+3093% | 408 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium 4 2.80 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Pentium 4 2.80 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Pentium 4 2.80). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Pentium 4 2.80 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Pentium 4 2.80 came in at $327. On launch pricing ($160 vs $327), Core i5-10400F was $167 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 1.2 pts/$ for the Pentium 4 2.80 — making the Core i5-10400F the 194% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Pentium 4 2.80 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160-51% | $327 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4+6683% | 1.2 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2002 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














