
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Pentium E2210
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +805.3% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+1100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 1 MB).
- ✅Delivers 580.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $84 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌90.5% HIGHER MSRP$160 MSRPvs$84 MSRP
Pentium E2210
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $76 less on MSRP ($84 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (500 vs 5,783).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($84 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
Core i5-10400F
2020Pentium E2210
2009Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +805.3% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+1100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 1 MB).
- ✅Delivers 580.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $84 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $76 less on MSRP ($84 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌90.5% HIGHER MSRP$160 MSRPvs$84 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (500 vs 5,783).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($84 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Pentium E2210?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Pentium E2210 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Pentium E2210 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 18 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Pentium E2210 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 25 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Pentium E2210 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Pentium E2210

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Pentium E2210
Pentium E2210
The Pentium E2210 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Pentium E2210 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 4 more cores. The Core i5-10400F is built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Pentium E2210's 1,005 — a 171.4% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 300, a 131.6% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 500 (168.2% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium E2210.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Pentium E2210 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+200% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+32% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+1100% | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | — |
| PassMark | 13,029+1196% | 1,005 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454+385% | 300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783+1057% | 500 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium E2210 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR2 on the Pentium E2210 — the Core i5-10400F supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 0 (Pentium E2210) — the Core i5-10400F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and Intel P35,Intel G33,Intel G31,Intel G41 (Pentium E2210).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Pentium E2210 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+100% | DDR2 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+3100% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs false (Pentium E2210). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Pentium E2210 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | false |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Pentium E2210 debuted at $84. On MSRP ($160 vs $84), the Pentium E2210 is $76 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 12.0 pts/$ for the Pentium E2210 — making the Core i5-10400F the 148.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Pentium E2210 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160 | $84-48% |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4+578% | 12.0 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












