
Core i5-10400F

Pentium E6600
Core i5-10400F vs Pentium E6600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-10400F vs Pentium E6600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-10400F vs Pentium E6600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +486.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Delivers 472.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 14.2 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $84 MSRP).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium E6600.
Trade-offs
- β90.5% HIGHER MSRP$160 MSRPvs$84 MSRP
Pentium E6600
2010Why buy it
- β Costs $76 less on MSRP ($84 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (1,194 vs 13,029).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 14.2 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($84 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Pentium E6600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10400F vs Pentium E6600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020β2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Pentium E6600
The Pentium E6600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008β2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,194 points. Launch price was $16.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Pentium E6600 offers 2 cores / 2 threads β the Core i5-10400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 0.07 GHz on the Pentium E6600 β a 193.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020β2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium E6600 uses Wolfdale (2008β2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Pentium E6600's 1,194 β a 166.4% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 0 kB on the Pentium E6600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Pentium E6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+200% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+6043% | 0.07 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.06 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+12700% | 2 MB (total) |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020β2025) | Wolfdale (2008β2010) |
| PassMark | 13,029+991% | 1,194 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium E6600 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Pentium E6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Pentium E6600). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Pentium E6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | β |
| Target Use | Gaming | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Pentium E6600 came in at $84. On launch pricing ($160 vs $84), Pentium E6600 was $76 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 14.2 pts/$ for the Pentium E6600 β making the Core i5-10400F the 140.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Pentium E6600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160 | $84-48% |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4+473% | 14.2 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














