
Core i5-10400F

Pentium III 1200
Core i5-10400F vs Pentium III 1200 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-10400F vs Pentium III 1200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-10400F vs Pentium III 1200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3357.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $40 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- β Delivers 8251.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 1.0 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium III 1200.
Trade-offs
- β116.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 30W.
Pentium III 1200
2001Why buy it
- β Draws 30W instead of 65W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (195 vs 13,029).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Pentium III 1200?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10400F vs Pentium III 1200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020β2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Pentium III 1200
The Pentium III 1200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tualatin (2000β2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA370. Thermal design power (TDP): 30 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 195 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Pentium III 1200 offers 1 cores / 1 threads β the Core i5-10400F has 5 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 1.2 GHz on the Pentium III 1200 β a 112.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F. The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020β2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium III 1200 uses Tualatin (2000β2002) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Pentium III 1200's 195 β a 194.1% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 0 kB on the Pentium III 1200.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Pentium III 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+500% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+258% | 1.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | β |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB |
| Process | 14 nm-89% | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020β2025) | Tualatin (2000β2002) |
| PassMark | 13,029+6582% | 195 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium III 1200 uses PGA370 (PCIe 1.1) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus SDR-133 on the Pentium III 1200 β the Core i5-10400F supports -2104.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 512 MB β 25500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-10400F) vs 1 (Pentium III 1200). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 0 (Pentium III 1200) β the Core i5-10400F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Pentium III 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | PGA370 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | SDR-133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+25500% | 512 MB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs None (Pentium III 1200). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Pentium III 1200 targets Legacy. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Pentium III 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | None |
| Target Use | Gaming | Legacy |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Pentium III 1200 came in at $200. On launch pricing ($160 vs $200), Core i5-10400F was $40 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 1.0 pts/$ for the Pentium III 1200 β making the Core i5-10400F the 195.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Pentium III 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160-20% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4+8040% | 1.0 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2001 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














