
Core i5-10400F

Pentium III 1400S
Core i5-10400F vs Pentium III 1400S Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-10400F vs Pentium III 1400S FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-10400F vs Pentium III 1400S: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +2781.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 8828.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 0.9 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌103.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 32W.
Pentium III 1400S
2002Why buy it
- ✅Draws 32W instead of 65W, a 33W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (228 vs 13,029).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Pentium III 1400S?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10400F vs Pentium III 1400S Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Pentium III 1400S
The Pentium III 1400S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tualatin (2000−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA370. Thermal design power (TDP): 32 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 228 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Pentium III 1400S offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 5 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 1.4 GHz on the Pentium III 1400S — a 101.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F. The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium III 1400S uses Tualatin (2000−2002) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Pentium III 1400S's 228 — a 193.1% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 0 kB on the Pentium III 1400S.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Pentium III 1400S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+500% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+207% | 1.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB+100% |
| Process | 14 nm-89% | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Tualatin (2000−2002) |
| PassMark | 13,029+5614% | 228 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium III 1400S uses PGA370 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus PC133 on the Pentium III 1400S — the Core i5-10400F supports 1904.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-10400F) vs 1 (Pentium III 1400S). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 0 (Pentium III 1400S) — the Core i5-10400F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and Intel 815,VIA Apollo Pro 133T (Pentium III 1400S).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Pentium III 1400S |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | PGA370 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+1905% | PC133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+3100% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs No (Pentium III 1400S). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Pentium III 1400S |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | No |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Pentium III 1400S came in at $250. On launch pricing ($160 vs $250), Core i5-10400F was $90 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 0.9 pts/$ for the Pentium III 1400S — making the Core i5-10400F the 195.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Pentium III 1400S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160-36% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4+8944% | 0.9 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2002 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














