
Core i5-10400F

Phenom II X3 720
Core i5-10400F vs Phenom II X3 720 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-10400F vs Phenom II X3 720 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-10400F vs Phenom II X3 720: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +359.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
- β Delivers 561.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β23.1% HIGHER MSRP$160 MSRPvs$130 MSRP
Phenom II X3 720
2010Why buy it
- β Costs $30 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower Geekbench multi-core (980 vs 5,783).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($130 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- β46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Phenom II X3 720?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10400F vs Phenom II X3 720 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020β2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Phenom II X3 720
The Phenom II X3 720 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Heka (2009β2010) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,600 points. Launch price was $75.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Phenom II X3 720 offers 3 cores / 3 threads β the Core i5-10400F has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X3 720 β a 42.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020β2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom II X3 720 uses Heka (2009β2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Phenom II X3 720's 1,600 β a 156.3% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 1,454 vs 380, a 117.1% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 980 (142% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X3 720.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Phenom II X3 720 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+100% | 3 / 3 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+54% | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+4% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+100% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020β2025) | Heka (2009β2010) |
| PassMark | 13,029+714% | 1,600 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454+283% | 380 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783+490% | 980 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X3 720 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR3-1333 on the Phenom II X3 720 β the Core i5-10400F supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB β 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and AM3,AM2+ (Phenom II X3 720).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Phenom II X3 720 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+100% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+700% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Phenom II X3 720 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs AMD-V (Phenom II X3 720). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Phenom II X3 720 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Phenom II X3 720 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | β | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Phenom II X3 720 came in at $130. On launch pricing ($160 vs $130), Phenom II X3 720 was $30 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 12.3 pts/$ for the Phenom II X3 720 β making the Core i5-10400F the 147.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Phenom II X3 720 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160 | $130-19% |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4+562% | 12.3 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















