Core i5-10400F vs Phenom X4 9750B

CPU

GPU

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Phenom X4 9750B

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2008

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-10400F vs Phenom X4 9750B Performance Spectrum

Core i5-10400F

6 / 12

13,029

+757.2%

1,520

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs Phenom X4 9750B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs Phenom X4 9750B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +379.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Costs $55 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $215 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1051.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 7.1 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $215 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Phenom X4 9750B

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,000 vs 5,783).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($215 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than Phenom X4 9750B?

Yes. Core i5-10400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 379.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 478.3% better Geekbench multi-core, 757.2% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 379.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 478.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-10400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-10400F comes in $55 cheaper on MSRP at $160 MSRP versus $215 MSRP, and it still gives you a 379.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1051.8% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 7.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2008), 500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-10400F vs Phenom X4 9750B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Phenom X4 9750B

The Phenom X4 9750B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,520 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Phenom X4 9750B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 2.4 GHz on the Phenom X4 9750B — a 56.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F. The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom X4 9750B uses Agena (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Phenom X4 9750B's 1,520 — a 158.2% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 300, a 131.6% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 1,000 (141% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9750B.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Phenom X4 9750B
Cores / Threads	6 / 12+50%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+79%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	—
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+500%	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Agena (2007−2008)
PassMark	13,029+757%	1,520
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454+385%	300
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783+478%	1,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom X4 9750B uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR2-1066 on the Phenom X4 9750B — the Core i5-10400F supports 150.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and AM2+,AM2 (Phenom X4 9750B).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Phenom X4 9750B
Socket	LGA1200	AM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666+150%	DDR2-1066
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+1500%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs AMD-V (Phenom X4 9750B). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Phenom X4 9750B targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Phenom X4 9750B
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	Legacy Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Phenom X4 9750B came in at $215. On launch pricing ($160 vs $215), Core i5-10400F was $55 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 7.1 pts/$ for the Phenom X4 9750B — making the Core i5-10400F the 168% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Phenom X4 9750B
MSRP	$160-26%	$215
Performance per Dollar	81.4+1046%	7.1
Release Date	2020	2008

Search Core i5-10400F on Amazon

Search Phenom X4 9750B on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.