
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Processor N97
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +136.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Processor N97.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Processor N97 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Processor N97 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
Processor N97
2023Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,445 vs 13,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Processor N97
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +136.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Processor N97.
Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Processor N97 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Processor N97 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,445 vs 13,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Processor N97?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Processor N97 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Processor N97 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 40 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Processor N97 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 136 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Processor N97 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 136 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Processor N97

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Processor N97
Processor N97
The Processor N97 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,445 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Processor N97 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 3.6 GHz on the Processor N97 — a 17.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Processor N97 uses Alder Lake-N (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Processor N97's 5,445 — a 82.1% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 6 MB (total) on the Processor N97.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Processor N97 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+19% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+45% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+100% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB (total)+700% |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
| PassMark | 13,029+139% | 5,445 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Processor N97 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Processor N97 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FCBGA1264 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Processor N97). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Processor N97 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Processor N97 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($160 vs $0), the Processor N97 is $160 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Processor N97 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4 | — |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












