Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 3 7320C

CPU

GPU

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Ryzen 3 7320C

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i5-10400F

6 / 12

13,029

+59.0%

8,193

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +59.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Costs $139 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 197.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 27.4 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 7320C moves to FT6 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 7320C can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 3 7320C

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FT6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,193 vs 13,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.4 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Ryzen 3 7320C

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +59.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Costs $139 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 197.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 27.4 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FT6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 7320C moves to FT6 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 7320C can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,193 vs 13,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.4 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than Ryzen 3 7320C?

Yes. Core i5-10400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 59.0% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data and 59% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 59.0% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the better fit. You are getting 59% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-10400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-10400F is $139 cheaper on MSRP at $160 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you a 59.0% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 197.2% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 27.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 7320C is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020) and a healthier platform with FT6 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 3 7320C Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 7320C
1080p
low	192 FPS	168 FPS
medium	152 FPS	134 FPS
high	123 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	84 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	141 FPS
medium	119 FPS	111 FPS
high	97 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	68 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	65 FPS
medium	70 FPS	55 FPS
high	55 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	34 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 3 7320C

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 7320C
1080p
low	326 FPS	205 FPS
medium	318 FPS	205 FPS
high	290 FPS	200 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	172 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	205 FPS
medium	292 FPS	195 FPS
high	267 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	151 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	171 FPS
medium	258 FPS	151 FPS
high	235 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	105 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 3 7320C

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 7320C
1080p
low	326 FPS	205 FPS
medium	326 FPS	205 FPS
high	326 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	205 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	205 FPS
medium	326 FPS	205 FPS
high	326 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	205 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	205 FPS
medium	326 FPS	205 FPS
high	289 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	205 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 3 7320C

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 7320C
1080p
low	326 FPS	205 FPS
medium	326 FPS	205 FPS
high	326 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	205 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	205 FPS
medium	326 FPS	205 FPS
high	326 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	205 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	205 FPS
medium	326 FPS	205 FPS
high	326 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	205 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 3 7320C

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 7320C

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Ryzen 3 7320C

The Ryzen 3 7320C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FT6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,193 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 7320C offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 3 7320C — a 4.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 7320C uses Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 3 7320C's 8,193 — a 45.6% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,163, a 22.2% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 7320C.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 7320C
Cores / Threads	6 / 12+50%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+5%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+21%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+200%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	6 nm-57%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023)
PassMark	13,029+59%	8,193
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454+25%	1,163
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 7320C uses FT6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus LPDDR5-5500 on the Ryzen 3 7320C — the Ryzen 3 7320C supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 4 (Ryzen 3 7320C) — the Core i5-10400F offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and SoC (Ryzen 3 7320C).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 7320C
Socket	LGA1200	FT6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	LPDDR5-5500+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+700%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+300%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs Yes (Ryzen 3 7320C). The Ryzen 3 7320C includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 7320C
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon 610M
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	Yes
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 7320C debuted at $299. On MSRP ($160 vs $299), the Core i5-10400F is $139 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 27.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 7320C — making the Core i5-10400F the 99.3% better value option.