Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 3 7335U

Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 7335U

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 7335U.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 7335U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
  • Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 7335U moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Ryzen 3 7335U

2023

Why buy it

  • Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (12,568 vs 13,029).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than Ryzen 3 7335U?
Yes. Core i5-10400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 12.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 3.7% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 12.5% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the better fit. You are getting 3.7% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-10400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-10400F is at an unclear MSRP at $160 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 7335U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020) and a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-10400FRyzen 3 7335U
1080p
low192 FPS165 FPS
medium152 FPS142 FPS
high123 FPS113 FPS
ultra100 FPS92 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS142 FPS
medium119 FPS119 FPS
high97 FPS95 FPS
ultra79 FPS78 FPS
4K
low82 FPS76 FPS
medium70 FPS68 FPS
high55 FPS54 FPS
ultra43 FPS42 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-10400FRyzen 3 7335U
1080p
low326 FPS254 FPS
medium318 FPS217 FPS
high290 FPS198 FPS
ultra253 FPS173 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS219 FPS
medium292 FPS189 FPS
high267 FPS176 FPS
ultra234 FPS151 FPS
4K
low309 FPS170 FPS
medium258 FPS150 FPS
high235 FPS124 FPS
ultra199 FPS101 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-10400FRyzen 3 7335U
1080p
low326 FPS314 FPS
medium326 FPS314 FPS
high326 FPS314 FPS
ultra326 FPS314 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS314 FPS
medium326 FPS314 FPS
high326 FPS314 FPS
ultra326 FPS292 FPS
4K
low326 FPS314 FPS
medium326 FPS274 FPS
high289 FPS239 FPS
ultra229 FPS190 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-10400FRyzen 3 7335U
1080p
low326 FPS314 FPS
medium326 FPS314 FPS
high326 FPS314 FPS
ultra326 FPS314 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS314 FPS
medium326 FPS314 FPS
high326 FPS314 FPS
ultra326 FPS314 FPS
4K
low326 FPS314 FPS
medium326 FPS314 FPS
high326 FPS314 FPS
ultra326 FPS314 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 7335U

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

AMD

Ryzen 3 7335U

The Ryzen 3 7335U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 12,568 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 7335U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 3 7335U — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 7335U uses Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 3 7335U's 12,568 — a 3.6% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 7335U.

FeatureCore i5-10400FRyzen 3 7335U
Cores / Threads
6 / 12+50%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
3 GHz+3%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+50%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
6 nm-57%
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Rembrandt-R (2023−2025)
PassMark
13,029+4%
12,568
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,191
Geekbench 6 Single
1,454
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,783
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 7335U uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-10400FRyzen 3 7335U
Socket
LGA1200
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen 3 7335U). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCore i5-10400FRyzen 3 7335U
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming