Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 3 8300GE

CPU

GPU

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Ryzen 3 8300GE

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2024

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i5-10400F

6 / 12

13,029

0.0%

13,568

+4.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 8300GE.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 8300GE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 13,568).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 105.2 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300GE moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Ryzen 3 8300GE

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $31 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
✅Delivers 29.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 105.2 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Ryzen 3 8300GE

2024

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 8300GE.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $31 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
✅Delivers 29.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 105.2 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 8300GE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 13,568).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 105.2 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300GE moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 8300GE better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Ryzen 3 8300GE is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 4.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 4.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 3 8300GE is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 4.7% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 8300GE is the better fit. You are getting 4.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 8300GE is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 3 8300GE is $31 cheaper on MSRP at $129 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 29.2% better value on MSRP (105.2 vs 81.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i5-10400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 8300GE is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 3 8300GE Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 8300GE
1080p
low	192 FPS	262 FPS
medium	152 FPS	233 FPS
high	123 FPS	199 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	168 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	230 FPS
medium	119 FPS	185 FPS
high	97 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	133 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	159 FPS
medium	70 FPS	129 FPS
high	55 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	86 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 3 8300GE

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 8300GE
1080p
low	326 FPS	339 FPS
medium	318 FPS	280 FPS
high	290 FPS	245 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	206 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	286 FPS
medium	292 FPS	238 FPS
high	267 FPS	214 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	176 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	212 FPS
medium	258 FPS	183 FPS
high	235 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	124 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 3 8300GE

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 8300GE
1080p
low	326 FPS	339 FPS
medium	326 FPS	339 FPS
high	326 FPS	339 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	339 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	339 FPS
medium	326 FPS	339 FPS
high	326 FPS	339 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	339 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	339 FPS
medium	326 FPS	339 FPS
high	289 FPS	339 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	293 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 3 8300GE

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 8300GE
1080p
low	326 FPS	339 FPS
medium	326 FPS	339 FPS
high	326 FPS	339 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	339 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	339 FPS
medium	326 FPS	339 FPS
high	326 FPS	339 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	339 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	339 FPS
medium	326 FPS	339 FPS
high	326 FPS	339 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	339 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 3 8300GE

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 8300GE

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Ryzen 3 8300GE

The Ryzen 3 8300GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,568 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 8300GE offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 8300GE — a 13% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 8300GE (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 8300GE uses Phoenix2 (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 3 8300GE's 13,568 — a 4.1% lead for the Ryzen 3 8300GE. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 8300GE.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 8300GE
Cores / Threads	6 / 12+50%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.9 GHz+14%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.5 GHz+21%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+300%
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Phoenix2 (2024)
PassMark	13,029	13,568+4%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 8300GE uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 8300GE
Socket	LGA1200	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen 3 8300GE). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 8300GE
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 8300GE debuted at $129. On MSRP ($160 vs $129), the Ryzen 3 8300GE is $31 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 105.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 8300GE — making the Ryzen 3 8300GE the 25.5% better value option.