Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

CPU

GPU

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2017

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i5-10400F

6 / 12

13,029

+83.4%

7,106

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +72.0% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Delivers 26.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 64.6 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 PRO 1300.

Trade-offs

❌
45.5% HIGHER MSRP
$160 MSRPvs$110 MSRP

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($110 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,106 vs 13,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 64.6 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($110 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +72.0% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Delivers 26.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 64.6 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 PRO 1300.

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($110 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌
45.5% HIGHER MSRP
$160 MSRPvs$110 MSRP

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,106 vs 13,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 64.6 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($110 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than Ryzen 3 PRO 1300?

Yes. Core i5-10400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 72.0% average FPS lead across 5 shared CPU game tests in our data, 83.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 72.0% more average FPS across 5 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the better fit. You are getting 83.4% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-10400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-10400F is 45.5% more expensive on MSRP at $160 MSRP versus $110 MSRP, and it gives you a 72.0% average FPS lead across 5 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 26.1% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 64.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017), 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
1080p
low	192 FPS	175 FPS
medium	152 FPS	152 FPS
high	123 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	145 FPS
medium	119 FPS	121 FPS
high	97 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	66 FPS
medium	70 FPS	59 FPS
high	55 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	35 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
1080p
low	326 FPS	163 FPS
medium	318 FPS	142 FPS
high	290 FPS	134 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	103 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	141 FPS
medium	292 FPS	122 FPS
high	267 FPS	114 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	91 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	111 FPS
medium	258 FPS	98 FPS
high	235 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	56 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
1080p
low	326 FPS	178 FPS
medium	326 FPS	178 FPS
high	326 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	178 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	178 FPS
medium	326 FPS	178 FPS
high	326 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	178 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	178 FPS
medium	326 FPS	178 FPS
high	289 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	128 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
1080p
low	326 FPS	178 FPS
medium	326 FPS	178 FPS
high	326 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	178 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	178 FPS
medium	326 FPS	178 FPS
high	326 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	178 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	178 FPS
medium	326 FPS	178 FPS
high	326 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	178 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

The Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 7,106 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 — a 20.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300's 7,106 — a 58.8% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Cores / Threads	6 / 12+50%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+23%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.2 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	13,029+83%	7,106
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Socket	LGA1200	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 1300). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 debuted at $110. On MSRP ($160 vs $110), the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is $50 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 64.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 — making the Core i5-10400F the 23.1% better value option.