
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.2% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Delivers 10.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 73.4 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌7.4% HIGHER MSRP$160 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $11 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 6, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (5,995 vs 8,191).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.4 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
Core i5-10400F
2020Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.2% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Delivers 10.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 73.4 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $11 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 6, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌7.4% HIGHER MSRP$160 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (5,995 vs 8,191).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.4 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 194 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 92 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 248 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 274 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.


Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 10,942 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G's 10,942 — a 17.4% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 5,995 (31% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,516, a 4.2% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 5,334 (8.1% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+7% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.8 GHz+31% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+200% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB+700% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 13,029+19% | 10,942 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191+37% | 5,995 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | 1,516+4% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783+8% | 5,334 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G) — the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,A520,B550,X570 (Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs Yes (Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G). The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 6), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Vega 6 |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G debuted at $149. On MSRP ($160 vs $149), the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is $11 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 73.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G — making the Core i5-10400F the 10.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160 | $149-7% |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4+11% | 73.4 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











