
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 14.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 70.9 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,761 vs 13,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 70.9 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($180 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 14.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 70.9 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,761 vs 13,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 70.9 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($180 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 159 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 118 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 319 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 319 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 319 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 319 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 319 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 301 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 212 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 319 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 319 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 319 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 319 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 319 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 319 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 319 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.


Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
The Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,761 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE uses Cezanne (2021−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE's 12,761 — a 2.1% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 8 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+2% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.6 GHz+24% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Cezanne (2021−2025) |
| PassMark | 13,029+2% | 12,761 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE debuted at $180. On MSRP ($160 vs $180), the Core i5-10400F is $20 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 70.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE — making the Core i5-10400F the 13.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160-11% | $180 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4+15% | 70.9 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











