PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Costs $16 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $176 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 14,540).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌
10% HIGHER MSRP
$176 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G

2024

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Costs $16 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $176 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 14,540).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌
10% HIGHER MSRP
$176 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 3.2% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 11.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 3.2% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the better fit. You are getting 11.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is 10.0% more expensive on MSRP at $176 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1.5% better value on MSRP (82.6 vs 81.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i5-10400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
1080p
low	192 FPS	262 FPS
medium	152 FPS	232 FPS
high	123 FPS	199 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	168 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	229 FPS
medium	119 FPS	184 FPS
high	97 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	132 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	159 FPS
medium	70 FPS	129 FPS
high	55 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	86 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
1080p
low	326 FPS	347 FPS
medium	318 FPS	280 FPS
high	290 FPS	245 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	206 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	286 FPS
medium	292 FPS	238 FPS
high	267 FPS	214 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	176 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	212 FPS
medium	258 FPS	183 FPS
high	235 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	124 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
1080p
low	326 FPS	364 FPS
medium	326 FPS	364 FPS
high	326 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	364 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	364 FPS
medium	326 FPS	364 FPS
high	326 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	364 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	364 FPS
medium	326 FPS	364 FPS
high	289 FPS	352 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	292 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
1080p
low	326 FPS	364 FPS
medium	326 FPS	364 FPS
high	326 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	364 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	364 FPS
medium	326 FPS	364 FPS
high	326 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	364 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	364 FPS
medium	326 FPS	364 FPS
high	326 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	364 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G

The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 14,540 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G — a 13% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G uses Phoenix2 (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G's 14,540 — a 11% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
Cores / Threads	6 / 12+50%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.9 GHz+14%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.4 GHz+17%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+300%
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Phoenix2 (2024)
PassMark	13,029	14,540+12%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
Socket	LGA1200	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G debuted at $176. On MSRP ($160 vs $176), the Core i5-10400F is $16 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 82.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G the 1.4% better value option.