
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 18,945).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 18,945).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 62 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 426 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 371 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 182 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 420 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 390 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 301 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.


Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE
Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE
The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is manufactured by AMD. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,945 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F is built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE's 18,945 — a 37% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | — |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm | — |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | — |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 18,945+45% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE debuted at $0. On MSRP ($160 vs $0), the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is $160 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4 | — |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












