
Core i5-10400F

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE
Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 18,945).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅+45.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.


Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE
The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE is manufactured by AMD. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,945 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F is built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE's 18,945 — a 37% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | — |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm | — |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | — |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 18,945+45% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE came in at $0. On launch pricing ($160 vs $0), Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE was $160 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4 | — |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














