Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 5 220

Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020
Core family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 220

6 Cores12 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 5 220 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 5 220 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 5 220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 220.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 220 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,783 vs 7,700).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 125.1 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.

Ryzen 5 220

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +20.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Costs $10 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
  • Delivers 53.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.1 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
  • Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 220 better than Core i5-10400F?
Yes. Ryzen 5 220 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 20.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 33.1% better Geekbench multi-core, 44.0% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 220 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 20.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 220 is the stronger fit. You are getting 33.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 220 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 220 comes in $10 cheaper on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you a 20.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 53.6% better value on MSRP (125.1 vs 81.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 220 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 5 220 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

AMD

Ryzen 5 220

The Ryzen 5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,762 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 220 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 220 — a 13% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 220 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 220 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 5 220's 18,762 — a 36.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 220. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,300, a 11.2% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 7,700 (28.4% advantage for the Ryzen 5 220). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 220.

FeatureCore i5-10400FRyzen 5 220
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz
4.9 GHz+14%
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
3.2 GHz+10%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)+25500%
1 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
4 nm-71%
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark
13,029
18,762+44%
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,191
Geekbench 6 Single
1,454+12%
1,300
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,783
7,700+33%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 220 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 5 220 — the Ryzen 5 220 supports 110.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 14 (Ryzen 5 220) — the Core i5-10400F offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and SoC (Ryzen 5 220).

FeatureCore i5-10400FRyzen 5 220
Socket
LGA1200
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
DDR5-5600+110%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+100%
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16+14%
14
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen 5 220 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 220). The Ryzen 5 220 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 740M), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Ryzen 5 220 targets Thin and Light Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCore i5-10400FRyzen 5 220
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 740M
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V
Target Use
Gaming
Thin and Light Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Ryzen 5 220 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($160 vs $150), Ryzen 5 220 was $10 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 125.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 220 — making the Ryzen 5 220 the 42.3% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-10400FRyzen 5 220
MSRP
$160
$150-6%
Performance per Dollar
81.4
125.1+54%
Release Date
2020
2025

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.