
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 2600E
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.4% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 2600E.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 2600E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Ryzen 5 2600E
2018Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,346 vs 13,029).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Ryzen 5 2600E
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.4% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 2600E.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 2600E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,346 vs 13,029).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Ryzen 5 2600E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 2600E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 2600E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 252 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 106 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 2600E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 200 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 2600E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 309 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 2600E

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.


Ryzen 5 2600E
Ryzen 5 2600E
The Ryzen 5 2600E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 12,346 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 2600E share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600E — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 2600E uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 5 2600E's 12,346 — a 5.4% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600E.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 2600E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+7% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.1 GHz+7% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 12 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 13,029+6% | 12,346 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 2600E uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 2600E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen 5 2600E). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 2600E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











