
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 4600G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 4600G across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 9,348).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 103.8 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $154 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 4600G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 4600G
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $6 less on MSRP ($154 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 103.8 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($154 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 7, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
Core i5-10400F
2020Ryzen 5 4600G
2020Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $6 less on MSRP ($154 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 103.8 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($154 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 7, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 4600G across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 9,348).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 103.8 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $154 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 4600G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 4600G better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 4600G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 4600G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 232 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 157 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 4600G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 400 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 372 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 232 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 4600G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 400 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 400 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 338 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 4600G

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.


Ryzen 5 4600G
Ryzen 5 4600G
The Ryzen 5 4600G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,985 points. Launch price was $154.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 4600G share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 4600G — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 4600G uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 5 4600G's 15,985 — a 20.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 4600G. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 9,348 (13.2% advantage for the Ryzen 5 4600G). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,578, a 8.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 4600G that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 6,619 (13.5% advantage for the Ryzen 5 4600G). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 4600G.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 4600G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+2% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.7 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 15,985+23% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | 9,348+14% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | 1,578+9% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | 6,619+14% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 4600G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 4600G) — the Ryzen 5 4600G offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and B450,X470,B550,X570,A520 (Ryzen 5 4600G).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 4600G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 4600G has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 4600G). The Ryzen 5 4600G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 7), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Ryzen 5 4600G targets Entry Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Ryzen 5 4600G rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 4600G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Vega 7 |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | Entry Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 4600G debuted at $154. On MSRP ($160 vs $154), the Ryzen 5 4600G is $6 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 103.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 4600G — making the Ryzen 5 4600G the 24.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 4600G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160 | $154-4% |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4 | 103.8+28% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











