
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 5560U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 5560U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 15,202).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 5560U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Ryzen 5 5560U
2021Why buy it
- ✅+16.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Ryzen 5 5560U
2021Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 5560U.
Why buy it
- ✅+16.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 15,202).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 5560U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5560U better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 5560U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 5560U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 113 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 5560U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 380 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 311 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 202 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 5560U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 380 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 380 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 331 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 285 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 5560U

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.


Ryzen 5 5560U
Ryzen 5 5560U
The Ryzen 5 5560U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 December 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-U (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 15,202 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 5560U share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5560U — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5560U uses Cezanne-U (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 5 5560U's 15,202 — a 15.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 5560U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 8 MB on the Ryzen 5 5560U.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 5560U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+7% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+26% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 3 MB+1100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Cezanne-U (Zen 3) (2021) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 15,202+17% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 5560U uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 5560U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen 5 5560U). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 5560U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











