
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $69 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600 across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 14,500).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 118.0 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600 moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +55.0% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 44.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 118.0 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($229 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌43.1% HIGHER MSRP$229 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
Core i5-10400F
2020Ryzen 5 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $69 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +55.0% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 44.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 118.0 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($229 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600 across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 14,500).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 118.0 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7600 moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌43.1% HIGHER MSRP$229 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7600 better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 366 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 318 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 225 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 675 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 657 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 575 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 675 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 412 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 284 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 675 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 675 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 675 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 675 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 675 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 675 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 666 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 567 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 454 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 392 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 7600

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.


Ryzen 5 7600
Ryzen 5 7600
The Ryzen 5 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,013 points. Launch price was $229.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 7600 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600 — a 17% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7600 uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 5 7600's 27,013 — a 69.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 14,500 (55.6% advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 2,800, a 63.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 12,000 (69.9% advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 5.1 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.8 GHz+31% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 27,013+107% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | 14,500+77% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | 2,800+93% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | 12,000+108% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 7600 uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 5 7600 — the Ryzen 5 7600 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 28 (Ryzen 5 7600) — the Ryzen 5 7600 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and A620,B650,X670,B840,B850,X870 (Ryzen 5 7600).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-5200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 28+75% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 7600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 5 7600 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600). The Ryzen 5 7600 includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Ryzen 5 7600 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Ryzen 5 7600 rivals Core i5-13400.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 7600 debuted at $229. On MSRP ($160 vs $229), the Core i5-10400F is $69 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 118.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 7600 — making the Ryzen 5 7600 the 36.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160-30% | $229 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4 | 118.0+45% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











