
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 21,544).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +39.7% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +39.7% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 21,544).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 279 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 193 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 539 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 539 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 293 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 539 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 539 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 539 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 539 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 519 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 462 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 393 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.


Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE
Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE
The Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,544 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE uses Phoenix2 (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE's 21,544 — a 49.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 5 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.4 GHz+17% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Phoenix2 (2024) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 21,544+65% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











