Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 7 1800X

CPU

GPU

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 1800X

8 Cores16 Thrd95 WWMax: 4 GHz2017

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 7 1800X Performance Spectrum

Core i5-10400F

6 / 12

13,029

0.0%

16,305

+25.1%

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 7 1800X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 7 1800X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $339 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 149.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 32.7 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 1800X.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 1800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 9,314).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).

Ryzen 7 1800X

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.7 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 1800X better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Ryzen 7 1800X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 13.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 25.1% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 1800X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 1800X is the stronger fit. You are getting 13.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 1800X is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 7 1800X comes in 211.9% more expensive on MSRP at $499 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 149.2% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 32.7 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i5-10400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 7 1800X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Ryzen 7 1800X

The Ryzen 7 1800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,305 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 1800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 1800X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1800X — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 1800X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 7 1800X's 16,305 — a 22.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 1800X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 9,314 (12.8% advantage for the Ryzen 7 1800X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,130, a 25.1% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 5,700 (1.4% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1800X.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 1800X
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+7%	4 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.6 GHz+24%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16384 kB+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	4096 kB+1500%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	13,029	16,305+25%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	9,314+14%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454+29%	1,130
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783+1%	5,700

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 1800X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 1800X) — the Ryzen 7 1800X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and AM4 (Ryzen 7 1800X).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 1800X
Socket	LGA1200	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 1800X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1800X). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Ryzen 7 1800X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Ryzen 7 1800X rivals Core i7-8700.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 1800X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Ryzen 7 1800X came in at $499. On launch pricing ($160 vs $499), Core i5-10400F was $339 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 32.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 1800X — making the Core i5-10400F the 85.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP	$160-68%	$499
Performance per Dollar	81.4+149%	32.7
Release Date	2020	2017

Search Core i5-10400F on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 1800X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.