PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $289 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
✅Delivers 29.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 63.0 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 5800X3D.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X3D across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 28,298).

Ryzen 7 5800X3D

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +71.1% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 63.0 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Ryzen 7 5800X3D

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $289 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
✅Delivers 29.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 63.0 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 5800X3D.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +71.1% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X3D across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 28,298).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 63.0 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5800X3D better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Ryzen 7 5800X3D is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 71.1% average FPS lead across 6 shared CPU game tests in our data, 117.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 5800X3D is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 71.1% more average FPS across 6 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 96 MB vs 12 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5800X3D is the better fit. You are getting 117.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (96 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 5800X3D is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 7 5800X3D is 180.6% more expensive on MSRP at $449 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 71.1% average FPS lead across 6 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 29.2% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 63.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i5-10400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 5800X3D is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020), 3D V-Cache and a much larger 96 MB L3 cache instead of 12 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 5800X3D Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 5800X3D
1080p
low	192 FPS	191 FPS
medium	152 FPS	165 FPS
high	123 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	161 FPS
medium	119 FPS	135 FPS
high	97 FPS	106 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	91 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	85 FPS
medium	70 FPS	77 FPS
high	55 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	49 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 5800X3D
1080p
low	326 FPS	704 FPS
medium	318 FPS	615 FPS
high	290 FPS	496 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	432 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	570 FPS
medium	292 FPS	510 FPS
high	267 FPS	429 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	351 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	332 FPS
medium	258 FPS	299 FPS
high	235 FPS	276 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	245 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 5800X3D
1080p
low	326 FPS	706 FPS
medium	326 FPS	607 FPS
high	326 FPS	566 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	498 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	568 FPS
medium	326 FPS	490 FPS
high	326 FPS	450 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	397 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	410 FPS
medium	326 FPS	342 FPS
high	289 FPS	308 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	256 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 7 5800X3D

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 5800X3D
1080p
low	326 FPS	707 FPS
medium	326 FPS	707 FPS
high	326 FPS	707 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	707 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	707 FPS
medium	326 FPS	707 FPS
high	326 FPS	703 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	625 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	659 FPS
medium	326 FPS	590 FPS
high	326 FPS	531 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Ryzen 7 5800X3D

The Ryzen 7 5800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,298 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 5800X3D has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X3D — a 4.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X3D (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X3D uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 7 5800X3D's 28,298 — a 73.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X3D. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5800X3D.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.5 GHz+5%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.4 GHz+17%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	96 MB (total)+700%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	7 nm, 12 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	13,029	28,298+117%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X3D uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X3D) — the Ryzen 7 5800X3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series (Ryzen 7 5800X3D).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Socket	LGA1200	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	24+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen 7 5800X3D). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5800X3D debuted at $449. On MSRP ($160 vs $449), the Core i5-10400F is $289 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 63.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5800X3D — making the Core i5-10400F the 25.5% better value option.