Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 7 5825C

CPU

GPU

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 5825C

8 Cores16 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 7 5825C Performance Spectrum

Core i5-10400F

6 / 12

13,029

0.0%

14,561

+11.8%

Ryzen Embedded V1756B

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 7 5825C FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 7 5825C: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $240 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Delivers 123.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 36.4 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 5825C.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5825C across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 9,551).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 5825C can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 7 5825C

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 36.4 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5825C better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Ryzen 7 5825C is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 16.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 11.8% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 5825C is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5825C is the stronger fit. You are getting 16.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 5825C is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 7 5825C comes in 150.0% more expensive on MSRP at $400 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 123.7% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 36.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 5825C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 7 5825C Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Ryzen 7 5825C

The Ryzen 7 5825C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,561 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5825C offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 5825C has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5825C — a 4.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5825C (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5825C uses Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 7 5825C's 14,561 — a 11.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 5825C. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 9,551 (15.3% advantage for the Ryzen 7 5825C). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,961, a 29.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 5825C that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 7,145 (21.1% advantage for the Ryzen 7 5825C). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5825C.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 5825C
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.5 GHz+5%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+45%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023)
PassMark	13,029	14,561+12%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	9,551+17%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	1,961+35%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	7,145+24%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 5825C uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5825C — the Ryzen 7 5825C supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 8 (Ryzen 7 5825C) — the Core i5-10400F offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and SoC (Ryzen 7 5825C).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 5825C
Socket	LGA1200	FP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-3200+20%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+100%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+100%	8

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs Yes (Ryzen 7 5825C). The Ryzen 7 5825C includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 5825C
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon Vega 8
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	Yes
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Ryzen 7 5825C came in at $400. On launch pricing ($160 vs $400), Core i5-10400F was $240 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 36.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5825C — making the Core i5-10400F the 76.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP	$160-60%	$400
Performance per Dollar	81.4+124%	36.4
Release Date	2020	2022

Search Core i5-10400F on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 5825C on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.