PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 7735HS.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7735HS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 13,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7735HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Ryzen 7 7735HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.0% higher average FPS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Ryzen 7 7735HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 7735HS.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.0% higher average FPS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7735HS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 13,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7735HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7735HS better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Ryzen 7 7735HS is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 15.0% average FPS lead across 24 shared CPU game tests in our data, 64.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 75.7% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 7735HS is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 15.0% more average FPS across 24 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7735HS is the better fit. You are getting 64.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 7735HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 7 7735HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 15.0% average FPS lead across 24 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 7735HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 7735HS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 7735HS
1080p
low	192 FPS	246 FPS
medium	152 FPS	230 FPS
high	123 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	165 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	217 FPS
medium	119 FPS	184 FPS
high	97 FPS	149 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	131 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	152 FPS
medium	70 FPS	129 FPS
high	55 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	87 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 7 7735HS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 7735HS
1080p
low	326 FPS	464 FPS
medium	318 FPS	392 FPS
high	290 FPS	339 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	296 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	397 FPS
medium	292 FPS	347 FPS
high	267 FPS	306 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	258 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	274 FPS
medium	258 FPS	246 FPS
high	235 FPS	229 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	195 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 7 7735HS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 7735HS
1080p
low	326 FPS	572 FPS
medium	326 FPS	572 FPS
high	326 FPS	494 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	403 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	572 FPS
medium	326 FPS	520 FPS
high	326 FPS	443 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	365 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	452 FPS
medium	326 FPS	380 FPS
high	289 FPS	333 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	272 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 7 7735HS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 7735HS
1080p
low	326 FPS	572 FPS
medium	326 FPS	572 FPS
high	326 FPS	572 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	572 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	572 FPS
medium	326 FPS	572 FPS
high	326 FPS	572 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	510 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	533 FPS
medium	326 FPS	487 FPS
high	326 FPS	434 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	376 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 7 7735HS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 7 7735HS

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Ryzen 7 7735HS

The Ryzen 7 7735HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.75 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,897 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7735HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 7735HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.75 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7735HS — a 9.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7735HS (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7735HS uses Rembrandt-HS Refresh (2023) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 7 7735HS's 22,897 — a 54.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 7735HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 13,500 (49% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7735HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,900, a 26.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 7735HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 8,800 (41.4% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7735HS). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7735HS.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 7735HS
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.75 GHz+10%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.2 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	6 nm-57%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Rembrandt-HS Refresh (2023)
PassMark	13,029	22,897+76%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	13,500+65%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	1,900+31%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	8,800+52%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 7735HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus LPDDR5-6400 on the Ryzen 7 7735HS — the Ryzen 7 7735HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 7735HS) — the Ryzen 7 7735HS offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and SoC (Ryzen 7 7735HS).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 7735HS
Socket	LGA1200	FP7
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	LPDDR5-6400+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+100%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7735HS). The Ryzen 7 7735HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Ryzen 7 7735HS targets High Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.